IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v7y2006i2-3p254-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transportation corridor decision-making with multi-attribute utility theory

Author

Listed:
  • Josias Zietsman
  • Laurence R. Rilett
  • Seung-Jun Kim

Abstract

This paper provides a description of how decisions concerning transportation programmes and projects can be made in the context of sustainable transportation. It provides information on identifying appropriate performance measures for sustainable transportation and then quantifying these measures with a traffic simulation model (CORSIM) as well as transportation environmental models. The quantified performance measures were then used with three decision making methodologies. The test bed used for this study comprised a transportation corridor in Tshwane, South Africa and one in Houston, Texas. A method based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) techniques was found to be the best because a broad range of quantitative and qualitative sustainability issues can be included in the decision-making process. In addition, the disaggregate approach proposed in this paper made it possible for decisions to be made at the individual link level.

Suggested Citation

  • Josias Zietsman & Laurence R. Rilett & Seung-Jun Kim, 2006. "Transportation corridor decision-making with multi-attribute utility theory," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 254-266.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:7:y:2006:i:2/3:p:254-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazli ERSOY, 2017. "Performance Measurement in Retail Industry By Using A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 17(4), pages 539-551.
    2. N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    3. Kuo-Hsiang CHEN & Ching-Chien LIANG & Ya-Hsueh LEE, 2017. "Kansei approach for the design of functional products for the elderly," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejms_v2_i.
    4. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Daim, Tugrul & Kunt, Meltem & Altay, Ayca & Suharto, Yulianto, 2017. "Scenarios for regional waste management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1323-1335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:7:y:2006:i:2/3:p:254-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.