IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v13y2020i2p99-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All job demands are not equal: exploring the two sides of a coin

Author

Listed:
  • Alka Rai
  • Shweta Jaiswal Thakur

Abstract

The principal objective of the present article is to evaluate the idea that all job demands are not identical. Literature review has been performed to assess the notion that all demands are not equal. Thus, the underlying rationale for segregation of job demands as challenges and hindrances has been evaluated. This study might be guiding for future research to answer the identified ambiguity and issues in job demand literature. The article may help researchers and practitioners to develop understanding regarding the potential of job demands in predicting work outcomes. The article may help scholars and managers to better understand the differential association of job demands with work related outcomes as such exploration is not much attempted in literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Alka Rai & Shweta Jaiswal Thakur, 2020. "All job demands are not equal: exploring the two sides of a coin," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 99-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:99-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steude Dietrich H., 2021. "Challenges of Remote Leadership in a Digitalized Working World 4.0," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 85(1), pages 65-86, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:99-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.