IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijklea/v17y2024i4p408-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing yinyang and fission-fusion algorithms for accelerating the k-means

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo Kuchar Matte
  • Maria do Carmo Nicoletti

Abstract

Given both, a set of data instances and an integer value k as input to the k-means clustering algorithm, a clustering represented as a partition of the given set into k groups (clusters) is produced by the algorithm. The k-means is considered relatively scalable and efficient in processing large sets of data instances. However, the inductive process the algorithm implements can have high time-related computational cost, depending on the given set of instances. Considering the algorithm invests most of its runtime in distance calculations, a way of accelerating its execution time is by avoiding calculations when possible. One way of doing that is by using a mathematical result known as triangle inequality. The main goal of the work described in this paper is to empirically investigate the contribution of the triangle inequality employed by two algorithms, the yinyang and the fission-fusion. Results from experiments using both algorithms on 17 datasets are evidence that, in general, the yinyang algorithm had a speed-up performance higher than that of the fission-fusion. However, in datasets where instances are described by a relatively small number of attributes (≤8), the fission-fusion had a better speed-up performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo Kuchar Matte & Maria do Carmo Nicoletti, 2024. "Comparing yinyang and fission-fusion algorithms for accelerating the k-means," International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 408-426.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:408-426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139558
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:408-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.