IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijklea/v17y2024i3p242-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the determinants of customer knowledge sharing in online brand communities? A meta-synthesis of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Mona Jami Pour
  • Seyed Mohammadbagher Jafari
  • Khadijeh Rafiei

Abstract

Despite the tendency of companies to the field of customer knowledge, there have been scattered studies on the factors that influence customer knowledge sharing in online brand communities, and there are few comprehensive investigations available in this field. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive framework that integrates the multiple factors of customer knowledge sharing in online brand communities. To obtain this purpose, a qualitative meta-synthesis research method was applied. After a systematic review of published studies ranging from 2006 to 2019, 59 articles were selected for analysis. The importance and priority of identified factors from meta-synthesis were determined using the quantitative method of Shannon entropy. The prioritised concepts are individual factors, social factors, motivational factors, and factors related to the structure of brand network relationships, technological factors, and brand-related factors, respectively. This study contributes to current customer knowledge research by offering theoretical advances related to sharing customer knowledge in online brand communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mona Jami Pour & Seyed Mohammadbagher Jafari & Khadijeh Rafiei, 2024. "What are the determinants of customer knowledge sharing in online brand communities? A meta-synthesis of the literature," International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 242-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:242-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138384
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijklea:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:242-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=42 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.