IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijitma/v9y2010i3p289-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring user adoption of mobile banking: an empirical study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaohua Deng
  • Yaobin Lu
  • Shimin Deng
  • Jinlong Zhang

Abstract

With the development of mobile technology, the number of people using mobile devices has increased greatly in China. While many reports indicate that mobile banking service has been applied in China, little is known about how people perceived this service. This study applies technology acceptance model (TAM) and other three constructs to examine the factors that influence the adoption of mobile banking in China. The proposed model was empirically evaluated by using survey data collected from 209 users concerning their perceptions of mobile banking. The findings indicate that TAM can predict consumer intention to use mobile banking. Specifically, trust-based construct, perceived credibility, has significant effect on user's attitude toward mobile banking. The results may provide further insights into China's future mobile banking market strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaohua Deng & Yaobin Lu & Shimin Deng & Jinlong Zhang, 2010. "Exploring user adoption of mobile banking: an empirical study in China," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 289-301.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:9:y:2010:i:3:p:289-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30945
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malgorzata Solarz & Jacek Adamek, 2021. "Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Adoption in Poland: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1018-1046.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:9:y:2010:i:3:p:289-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=18 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.