IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v3y2006i6p593-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research propositions for knowledge management systems supporting electronic business

Author

Listed:
  • Petter Gottschalk

Abstract

This paper documents some of the links between e-business and knowledge management systems that need to be explored in future empirical research. The research propositions in this paper illustrate the need for a contingent approach to knowledge management systems that are to support e-business. Knowledge management systems successfully supporting and improving e-business performance have to satisfy several requirements. First, they have to support the chosen e-business model(s). Second, they have to cause improvements through redesign of e-business processes. Furthermore, more advanced stage of knowledge management technology in terms of codification strategy will be more powerful and successful. These are some of the research propositions presented in this paper, which represents a rich knowledge base for future empirical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Petter Gottschalk, 2006. "Research propositions for knowledge management systems supporting electronic business," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(6), pages 593-606.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:6:p:593-606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=10514
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Norbert Kailer & Alexandra Weinmann & Nuria Chaparro-Banegas & Norat Roig-Tierno, 2021. "Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:6:p:593-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.