IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v3y2006i1p63-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is development of organisational culture a path-dependent process?

Author

Listed:
  • Petri Helo
  • Tauno Kekale

Abstract

In this paper, we review the idea of path-dependent processes and study the analogues to the development of organisational cultures and the managerial implications arising from this. We propose that culture creation is analogical to a path-dependent series of events that can be described with Polya-type process models. The graphical presentation of some hypothetical development paths is helpful in discussing some implications for management choices in culture change situations. Some cultures can be seen to be closer to each other, and changing from one to the other would be possible by incremental change, either by choosing to attempt to change the prevailing set of beliefs to something where the beliefs do not differ much. Alternatively, trends in environment can make cultures 'drift' so that beliefs that are quite far away from each other can get closer to each other over time. It might be possible to wait for the optimum time for change to succeed. The main function of this paper is to act as the discussion opener in path-dependency in cultures, but we also briefly discuss the implications, as well as the main shortcomings of the approach and suggestions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Petri Helo & Tauno Kekale, 2006. "Is development of organisational culture a path-dependent process?," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 63-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:63-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=8180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:63-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.