IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v37y2025i2p226-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Belajar.id vs. WAG: as feedback digital learning tools in primary school

Author

Listed:
  • Harun Joko Prayitno
  • Hengki Purnomo
  • Choiriyah Widyasari
  • Laili Etika Rahmawati
  • Naufal Ishartanto
  • Sutama Sutama
  • Sugeng Riyanto

Abstract

The application of belajar.id based on Google Workspace for Education is an assistance from Indonesian Ministry of Education to facilitate teachers in online learning. The study aims to test the effectivity of belajar.id application on online learning compared with conventional methods with WhatsApp Groups (WAG). The population of this study is all VA and VB grade students total of 55 Students. The research is a quasi-experiment. The effectivity was calculated using N-Gain formula. The results proved that the use of belajar.id is categorised as an effective learning with 53% N-Gain score, while WAG with less effective categories (49%). The belajar.id system offers distinct features, including secure storage on Google Drive for materials, individual or group feedback options, and indefinite learning, making it superior to WAG for assessment, assignment, and questions exchange despite requiring more time management. This study contributed effectivity information of belajar.id application, a new model of online learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Harun Joko Prayitno & Hengki Purnomo & Choiriyah Widyasari & Laili Etika Rahmawati & Naufal Ishartanto & Sutama Sutama & Sugeng Riyanto, 2025. "Belajar.id vs. WAG: as feedback digital learning tools in primary school," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(2), pages 226-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:226-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144204
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:226-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.