IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v36y2024i4p389-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role conflicts at home: a qualitative case study on college students' online learning during COVID-19 based on the social role theory

Author

Listed:
  • Luying Qiu
  • Mingxia Hao
  • Taotao Long

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 at the end of 2019 led to large-scale online learning at home among college students. Because of the overlap between being a student and other roles when they are at home, students need to play a variety of roles. With the social role theory as the theoretical framework, this qualitative case study had an in-depth investigation on seven college students' current self-role and current learning situation at home during COVID-19. The findings highlighted that college students mainly faced the following three role conflicts: the conflicts caused by difficulties in adapting to multiple roles, the conflicts caused by different role expectations on their behaviours, and the conflicts caused by insufficient role comprehension on role cognition. This study also revealed that these role conflicts would have a certain negative impact on college students' learning and living. However, college students had positive attitudes towards the role conflicts and challenges. They still worked hard to overcome role conflicts, positively took the family and social responsibilities, and tried to realise their own values when fighting against the pandemic. Implications are discussed in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Luying Qiu & Mingxia Hao & Taotao Long, 2024. "Role conflicts at home: a qualitative case study on college students' online learning during COVID-19 based on the social role theory," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(4), pages 389-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:389-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:389-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.