IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v35y2024i4p482-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on employees' knowledge-sharing behaviour evidence from logistics firms in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Hoang Phung Nguyen Bach
  • Quang Dung Truong
  • Nam Tien Duong

Abstract

Knowledge sharing (KS) has been an essential part of logistics systems. Besides, the advancement of mobile devices and virtual communities has changed how information and working behaviours are processed and promoted KS activities in logistic firms. Therefore, with the integration of three theories, including social influence, technology acceptance model, and social cognition, this study aims to explore the antecedents of mobilised KS intention and behaviour and to make a more comprehensive framework for mobilised KS. A structured questionnaire investigated 377 employees in 31 units in logistics firms. The study found that social influence factors were positively related to the mobilised KS intention, and KS intention was also positively associated with KS behaviour. However, technology trust has a moderating effect on the relationship between mobilised KS intention and behaviour. This study's novelty is integrating the antecedents of mobilised KS intention and behaviour into three theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoang Phung Nguyen Bach & Quang Dung Truong & Nam Tien Duong, 2024. "A study on employees' knowledge-sharing behaviour evidence from logistics firms in Vietnam," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 482-509.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:482-509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=138815
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:482-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.