IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v2y2005i4p402-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of the knowledge management framework as a tool for innovation capability audit

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Biloslavo

Abstract

As effective innovation management needs to balance efficient coordination and the proper spending of limited resources on the one hand and creative chaos on the other hand, it is of critical importance to understand the whole structure of relationships and implications of processes involved. Success of innovation processes in relation to knowledge management has become a popular research topic in the last decade. In this way, we learned that early economic-oriented insights about importance of Ramp;D expenditure are not enough to explain the difference between innovation success and failure. It was found that more important than R&D expenditure are different factors such as people, information and communication technology, knowledge management processes, culture, organisation structure, management systems, process of assets allocation. As theoretical and empirical work in knowledge and innovation management has brought a large number of sub-theories and fragmented solutions, it is difficult for an organisation to know how to put all the key success factors together. For this reason, I propose a holistic knowledge management framework, which in a systemic way includes and connects all relevant organisation elements and its sub-dimensions in short, middle, and long time frame. Based on this, I then developed an innovation capability audit model and a related self-assessment questionnaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Biloslavo, 2005. "Use of the knowledge management framework as a tool for innovation capability audit," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 402-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:2:y:2005:i:4:p:402-424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6663
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:2:y:2005:i:4:p:402-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.