IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v2y2005i2p197-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic nature of feedback loops in product development

Author

Listed:
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola
  • Petri Helo
  • Ari Maunuksela

Abstract

In contemporary industrial management, Design Structure Matrix (DSM) has been applied in managing uncertain and unpredictable product development processes. In many cases the problems are arising from the feedback loops; one of the most awkward situations is the feedback dependency from the last task to the starting phase of the project. This kind of situation will not only increase the costs of development activity, but will increase the development time as well, which is the key factor to maintain competitiveness in markets. However, DSM research has been able to solve partially these problems with clustering; instead of task-based management, product development is managed through important clusters of numerous different tasks-processes. Justification of feedback loops is an increasingly important research issue in the current as well as future research of DSM. This paper will analyse further the economic impacts of probability for feedback loops and available number of strategic alternatives in decision-making to possibly avoid these situations. Economic tradeoff will occur between feedback loop costs and the costs of increasing the organisational awareness of process problems. Based on this modeling, some managerial recommendations are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Petri Helo & Ari Maunuksela, 2005. "The economic nature of feedback loops in product development," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 197-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:197-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:197-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.