IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v6y2013i2p248-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European vs. Indian ITES employees: a comparison of their work attitude and behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Anil Anand Pathak
  • Sharadindu Pandey

Abstract

This study compares the work attitude and behaviour of Indian and European employees. This study selects certain values and characteristics which are relevant to Indian information technology industry. The field survey method is used to collect data. Data are collected from total of 152 employees including equal number of Indians and Europeans. Mann-Whitney test statistics is applied to test hypothesis. A significant difference is noted between two groups of employees on the criteria such as sensitivity to hierarchy, 'no saying' attitude, giving strong feedback about colleagues, willingness to work with teams, work pressure and punctuality. There is no significant difference on gender bias. The study collects data based on the industry specific characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil Anand Pathak & Sharadindu Pandey, 2013. "European vs. Indian ITES employees: a comparison of their work attitude and behaviour," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 248-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:6:y:2013:i:2:p:248-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yogesh N. Naik & Monika Bisht, 2016. "Effectiveness drivers for Indian information technology managers: an empirical study," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 72-91.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:6:y:2013:i:2:p:248-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.