IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v22y2018i4-5p471-488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditions of implementation of employee-driven innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Søren Voxted

Abstract

This paper discusses the opportunities and barriers for the transfer of employees' ideas to implementation of new solutions in employee-driven innovation. The theoretical approach is the existing research not only on innovation transfer but also on the transfer of learning, knowledge and technology. Based on the results from an action research project aimed at training and involving shop-floor employees in employee-driven innovation, the paper identifies five factors that have been crucial to the process of transfer from employees' ideas to new solutions in production. The paper discusses five factors for transfer compared with existing literature and knowledge on employee-driven innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Søren Voxted, 2018. "Conditions of implementation of employee-driven innovation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4/5), pages 471-488.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:22:y:2018:i:4/5:p:471-488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92974
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chukwuemeka Echebiri & Stein Amundsen & Marit Engen, 2020. "Linking Structural Empowerment to Employee-Driven Innovation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Opland, Leif Erik & Pappas, Ilias O. & Engesmo, Jostein & Jaccheri, Letizia, 2022. "Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 255-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:22:y:2018:i:4/5:p:471-488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.