IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v18y2014i2-3p115-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of perceived barriers to entrepreneurship in Eastern and Western European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana A. Iakovleva
  • Lars Kolvereid
  • Marjan J. Gorgievski
  • Øystein Sørhaug

Abstract

This qualitative study among 591 business students from four European countries investigated cross-country differences in the kind of barriers people perceive to business start-up. In line with institutional theory, the most important perceived barriers in all countries related to regulative structures (lack of money) and cognitive conditions (lack of skills). Normative structures, defined as national culture, did not explain cross-country differences in perceived risk as start-up barrier. In Norway and The Netherlands, students reported risk perceptions more often than in Romania and Russia, whereas the latter countries are known to be more uncertainty avoidant. These results aid in developing a theory of entrepreneurial barriers, which could be used to extend current entrepreneurial intentions theories in order to predict actual start-up behaviour better. Concerning practical implications, results indicate that business start-up can be stimulated through improving regulative and cognitive institutional structures, but national differences need to be taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana A. Iakovleva & Lars Kolvereid & Marjan J. Gorgievski & Øystein Sørhaug, 2014. "Comparison of perceived barriers to entrepreneurship in Eastern and Western European countries," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2/3), pages 115-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:18:y:2014:i:2/3:p:115-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=62874
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitry Khanin & Robert Rosenfield & Raj V. Mahto & Cherry Singhal, 2022. "Barriers to entrepreneurship: opportunity recognition vs. opportunity pursuit," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1147-1167, May.
    2. Maha Aly & Galal Galal-Edeen, 2021. "Why is Germany less entrepreneurial? A behavioral reasoning perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1376-1416, October.
    3. Rohit H. Trivedi, 2017. "Entrepreneurial-intention constraint model: A comparative analysis among post-graduate management students in India, Singapore and Malaysia," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1239-1261, December.
    4. Lopes João & Antunes Helder & Rodrigues Ricardo, 2018. "Comparative Entrepreneurship between Western Europe and Latin America," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Pankaj C. Patel & Cornelius A. Rietveld, 2022. "Does globalization affect perceptions about entrepreneurship? The role of economic development," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1545-1562, March.
    6. Samia Shabnaz & Nazrul Islam, 2021. "A Study on Entrepreneurial Intention of University Students in Bangladesh," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Chiara Cannavale & Giorgia Rivieccio & Lorenza Claudio & Iman Zohoorian Nadali, 2023. "The impact of gender egalitarianism on entrepreneurial cognition: a multilevel analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4803-4826, October.
    8. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a Career Option for Information Technology Students: Critical Barriers and the Role of Motivation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 1133-1167, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:18:y:2014:i:2/3:p:115-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.