IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v9y2015i4p437-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical insights in system modelling: an application to the field of innovation systems

Author

Listed:
  • UngKyu Han
  • Martin Kunc

Abstract

This paper argues for the need to establish a 'dualistic' philosophical approach to systems in system dynamics modelling. The example of a regional innovation system permits an investigation into the influence of philosophical perspectives on the analysis of systems, including decision-making processes and the implementation of policies identifying key influences. Results show that any dynamic regional innovation system, over time, finds it impossible to apply only one approach, with the result that the perception of its systemic problems and the corresponding managerial solutions are likely to change. Therefore, system dynamicists in the innovation policy area should pursue a dialectical policy of 'thesis-antithesis-synthesis', reflecting the ever-changing conditions within and around innovation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • UngKyu Han & Martin Kunc, 2015. "Philosophical insights in system modelling: an application to the field of innovation systems," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 437-453.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:437-453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=69681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Damásio Lima & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Miguel Afonso Sellitto, 2017. "Systemic Analysis of the Brazilian Production Chain of Semiconductors: Graphic Representation and Leverage Points," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 295-316, June.
    2. Kairui Zuo & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 175-194, July.
    3. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Guilherme Schreiber Pereira & Rafael Marques & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, 2018. "Systemic Understanding of Coopetitive Behaviour in a Latin American Technological Park," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 479-494, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:437-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.