IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcgov/v15y2025i1p75-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of board attributes on the quality of integrated reports: evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Devarapalli Suman
  • Sasikanta Tripathy
  • Lalita Mohan Mohapatra

Abstract

Integrated reporting (IR) is a novel concept in corporate sustainability reporting, which prompts corporates for voluntary adoption of the reporting practice to generate value. The board features play a significant role in the adoption of IR. The IR has received significant attention but the impact of the board features on IR quality is still not extensively examined in developing countries like India. This study fills the gap by examining the association between board characteristics and IR quality in Indian context. The study employed fixed effect and random effect models for 46 corporates for a period of three years, i.e., 2019–2021. The empirical analysis found that board size, CEO duality, number of board meetings, and firm size had significant association with IR quality. In contrast, the number of independent members on board, percentage of women on board, liquidity and solvency has insignificant relationship with IR quality. This study extends the applicability of agency and stakeholders' theories to the IR framework. The study has implications for corporate executives and academicians on the effectiveness board features on IR quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Devarapalli Suman & Sasikanta Tripathy & Lalita Mohan Mohapatra, 2025. "Effect of board attributes on the quality of integrated reports: evidence from India," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 75-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:75-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcgov:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:75-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=260 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.