IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v5y2011i3p347-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The theory behind hoshin: a quantitative investigation of Toyota's strategic planning process

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip W. Marksberry

Abstract

Many companies have attempted to imitate and copy Toyota's strategic planning process more formally known as hoshin kanri in the implementation of lean manufacturing. Unfortunately, most observations of hoshin fail to quantify and accurately represent how such preferences are designed and integrated into Toyota's strategic planning process. This study combines classical strategic planning theory and latent semantic analysis in the study and classification of Toyota's hoshin kanri practices. This study shows that Toyota's hoshin practices inherently have preferences towards resource- and knowledge-based theory which means that internal development of resources, especially human capital is of high importance. Interestingly, Toyota's blend between emergent and deliberate strategic planning approaches creates a targeted creativity style that is difficult to establish without a highly structured problem-solving process. Toyota's hoshin process is also well balanced between the agency aspects of cross-organisational commitment which means that the strategy formation and implementation aspects are more closely integrated compared to traditional approaches. This new insight and others provide an increased understanding of Toyota's hoshin kanri process and practices that relate to the implementation of Toyota production system.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip W. Marksberry, 2011. "The theory behind hoshin: a quantitative investigation of Toyota's strategic planning process," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 347-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:5:y:2011:i:3:p:347-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:5:y:2011:i:3:p:347-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.