IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v21y2020i1p128-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National culture as a moderator in ambidexterity-performance relationships: a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eunah Lim
  • Nelson Santos António

Abstract

This meta-analysis uses 44 existing studies conducted in single-nation contexts (k = 44), constituting an aggregated sample of 20,886 observations (N = 20,886), to assess the potential moderating role of national culture on organisational ambidexterity-performance relationships. The results indicate an overall positive ambidexterity-performance link, which is stronger in countries with low levels of institutional collectivism, high levels of in-group collectivism, low levels of future orientation, low levels of performance orientation, and low levels of uncertainty avoidance. Additionally, counter to expectation, results suggest that the ambidexterity-performance relationship is stronger in countries with high levels of power distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunah Lim & Nelson Santos António, 2020. "National culture as a moderator in ambidexterity-performance relationships: a meta-analysis," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 128-149.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:128-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Szydło & Justyna Grześ-Bukłaho, 2020. "Relations between National and Organisational Culture—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:21:y:2020:i:1:p:128-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.