IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbfmi/v2y2016i3p175-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-item periodic review probabilistic fuzzy inventory model with possibility and necessity constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Totan Garai
  • Dipankar Chakraborty
  • Tapan Kumar Roy

Abstract

This paper investigates a multi-item periodic review probabilistic inventory model in fuzzy environment. Here, we have considered a single source of the inventory model with zero lead time and varying order cost under two limitations, such as holding cost and safety stock. By employing the fuzzy expectation and possibility/necessity measure, the fuzzy model is transformed into an equivalent deterministic non-linear programming problem. Finally, the model is illustrated with the help of numerical example and few sensitivity analyses are also presented for different parameter to show the validity of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Totan Garai & Dipankar Chakraborty & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2016. "A multi-item periodic review probabilistic fuzzy inventory model with possibility and necessity constraints," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 175-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:175-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78601
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maiti, Manas Kumar, 2008. "Fuzzy inventory model with two warehouses under possibility measure on fuzzy goal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 746-774, August.
    2. Lee, Yun Shin, 2014. "Management of a periodic-review inventory system using Bayesian model averaging when new marketing efforts are made," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 278-289.
    3. Bakker, Monique & Riezebos, Jan & Teunter, Ruud H., 2012. "Review of inventory systems with deterioration since 2001," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 275-284.
    4. Maity, K. & Maiti, M., 2007. "Possibility and necessity constraints and their defuzzification--A multi-item production-inventory scenario via optimal control theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 882-896, March.
    5. Ekrem Erdem & Onur Gozbasi & M. Fatih Ilgun & Saban Nazlioglu, 2010. "Stock market and economic growth nexus in emerging markets: cointegration and causality analysis," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3/4), pages 262-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhunia, A.K. & Shaikh, Ali Akbar, 2015. "An application of PSO in a two-warehouse inventory model for deteriorating item under permissible delay in payment with different inventory policies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 831-850.
    2. V. Radhamani & B. Sivakumar & G. Arivarignan, 2022. "A Comparative Study on Replenishment Policies for Perishable Inventory System with Service Facility and Multiple Server Vacation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 229-265, March.
    3. Chenavaz, Régis & Paraschiv, Corina, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for inventories with reference price effects," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-16.
    4. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    5. Kouki, Chaaben & Babai, M. Zied & Jemai, Zied & Minner, Stefan, 2016. "A coordinated multi-item inventory system for perishables with random lifetime," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 226-237.
    6. Janssen, Larissa & Diabat, Ali & Sauer, Jürgen & Herrmann, Frank, 2018. "A stochastic micro-periodic age-based inventory replenishment policy for perishable goods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 445-465.
    7. Wang, Wan-Chih & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Lou, Kuo-Ren, 2014. "Seller’s optimal credit period and cycle time in a supply chain for deteriorating items with maximum lifetime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 315-321.
    8. Duan, Qinglin & Liao, T. Warren, 2013. "A new age-based replenishment policy for supply chain inventory optimization of highly perishable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 658-671.
    9. Kumar Maiti, Manas, 2011. "A fuzzy genetic algorithm with varying population size to solve an inventory model with credit-linked promotional demand in an imprecise planning horizon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 96-106, August.
    10. Reza Maihami & Behrooz Karimi & Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Fatemi Ghomi, 2017. "Effect of two-echelon trade credit on pricing-inventory policy of non-instantaneous deteriorating products with probabilistic demand and deterioration functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 237-273, October.
    11. Nita H. Shah & Chetansinh R. Vaghela, 2017. "Economic order quantity for deteriorating items under inflation with time and advertisement dependent demand," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(1), pages 168-180, March.
    12. Buisman, M.E. & Haijema, R. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., 2019. "Discounting and dynamic shelf life to reduce fresh food waste at retailers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 274-284.
    13. Dobson, Gregory & Pinker, Edieal J. & Yildiz, Ozlem, 2017. "An EOQ model for perishable goods with age-dependent demand rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 84-88.
    14. Yang, Lei & Tang, Ruihong, 2019. "Comparisons of sales modes for a fresh product supply chain with freshness-keeping effort," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 425-448.
    15. Gharaei, Abolfazl & Almehdawe, Eman, 2020. "Economic growing quantity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Pourya Pourhejazy, 2020. "Destruction Decisions for Managing Excess Inventory in E-Commerce Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Raghu Nandan Giri & Shyamal Kumar Mondal & Manoranjan Maiti, 2021. "Analysis of strategies for substitutable and complementary products in a two-levels fuzzy supply chain system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 485-524, March.
    18. Tai, Allen H. & Xie, Yue & Ching, Wai-Ki, 2016. "Inspection policy for inventory system with deteriorating products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 22-29.
    19. Li‐Ming Chen & Amar Sapra, 2021. "Inventory renewal for a perishable product: Economies of scale and age‐dependent demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(3), pages 359-377, April.
    20. Onur Kaya & Aylin Lelizar Polat, 2017. "Coordinated pricing and inventory decisions for perishable products," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 589-606, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:175-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=156 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.