IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijatma/v9y2009i3p260-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing mass customisation in the automotive industry: an analysis of requirements for procurement and procurement objects

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Schentler

Abstract

The customisation of mass-produced products according to individual customers' wishes has gained high-level importance in many industries during the last decades. Due to highly competitive pressure and satisfied markets, the automotive industry is particularly affected by this development. Mass customisation should enable companies producing goods to meet individual customers' needs with near mass production efficiency by combining the advantages of single-part production and mass production. However, for the implementation of mass customisation, an adjustment of all processes, such as research and development as well as material and information flows in procurement, production and distribution, is necessary. Special attention has to be given to inbound supply chain management and procurement. This paper presents an analysis of the development and the manufacturing of mass-customised goods, the interplay between mass production and mass customisation, and the goals of mass customisation to find out which procurement objects and which requirements for procurement occur in mass customisation. Six specific categories of procurement objects and 17 requirements for procurement were identified during the analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Schentler, 2009. "Implementing mass customisation in the automotive industry: an analysis of requirements for procurement and procurement objects," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 260-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijatma:v:9:y:2009:i:3:p:260-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saghiri, Soroosh S. & Barnes, Stuart J., 2016. "Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 170-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijatma:v:9:y:2009:i:3:p:260-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=2 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.