IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v7y2013i8p49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Skewness on Statistical Power

Author

Listed:
  • Ötüken Senger

Abstract

In this study, in order to research the effect of skewness on statistical power, four different distributions are handled in power function of Fleishman in which the kurtosis value is 0.00 and the skewness values are 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and 0.00. In the study, Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample tests are taken benefit of and the importance level of ? is taken as 0.05. The sample sizes used in the study are the equal and small sample sizes from (2, 2) to (20, 20); additionally, in this study the mean ratio of the samples are taken as 0-0.5, 0-1, 0-1.5, 0-2, 0-2.5 and 0-3. As per the results obtained from the study, when the kurtosis coefficient in the same sample size is maintained fixed and taken as 0, and when the skewness coefficient is increased from 0 to 0.25, big scale of changes do not occur in the statistical power. When the skewness ratio is increased from 0.25 to 0.50; while the ratio of the means are 0-0.5, 0-1 and 0-1.5; decrease is viewed in the statistical power, and when the ratio of the means are 0-2, 0-2.5 and 0-3; increase is viewed in the statistical power. And when the kurtosis coefficient is increased from 0.50 to 0.75 it is viewed that almost in all of the ratios mean the statistical power is increasing. It is concluded that the statistical power increases as the ratio of the means is increasing for all of the sample sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ötüken Senger, 2013. "Impact of Skewness on Statistical Power," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(8), pages 1-49, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:7:y:2013:i:8:p:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/24552/17215
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/24552
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen Fleishman, 1978. "A method for simulating non-normal distributions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 521-532, December.
    2. Jushan Bai & Serena Ng, 2005. "Tests for Skewness, Kurtosis, and Normality for Time Series Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 23, pages 49-60, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Kunpeng & Lin, Wei, 2024. "Threshold spatial autoregressive model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
    2. Javier Alejo & Antonio Galvao & Gabriel Montes-Rojas & Walter Sosa-Escudero, 2015. "Tests for normality in linear panel-data models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(3), pages 822-832, September.
    3. James Mitchell & Richard J. Smith & Martin R. Weale, 2013. "Efficient Aggregation Of Panel Qualitative Survey Data," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 580-603, June.
    4. Kohlbrecher, Britta & Merkl, Christian, 2022. "Business cycle asymmetries and the labor market," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Masayuki Hirukawa & Mari Sakudo, 2016. "Testing Symmetry of Unknown Densities via Smoothing with the Generalized Gamma Kernels," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Christoph Gortz & John D. Tsoukalas, 2013. "Learning, Capital Embodied Technology and Aggregate Fluctuations," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 16(4), pages 708-723, October.
    7. Schinckus, Christophe, 2015. "The valuation of social impact bonds: An introductory perspective with the Peterborough SIB," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 104-110.
    8. Max Auerswald & Morten Moshagen, 2015. "Generating Correlated, Non-normally Distributed Data Using a Non-linear Structural Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 920-937, December.
    9. Mohan D. Pant & Todd C. Headrick, 2017. "Simulating Uniform- and Triangular- Based Double Power Method Distributions," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 1-1.
    10. Turan Bali & Panayiotis Theodossiou, 2007. "A conditional-SGT-VaR approach with alternative GARCH models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 241-267, April.
    11. Jasman Tuyon & Zamri Ahmada, 2016. "Behavioural finance perspectives on Malaysian stock market efficiency," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 16(1), pages 43-61, March.
    12. Angus Moore, 2017. "Measuring Economic Uncertainty and Its Effects," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(303), pages 550-575, December.
    13. Davide Delle Monache & Andrea De Polis & Ivan Petrella, 2024. "Modeling and Forecasting Macroeconomic Downside Risk," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 1010-1025, July.
    14. Schinckus, Christophe, 2018. "The valuation of social impact bonds: An introductory perspective with the Peterborough SIB," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-6.
    15. Marian Vavra, 2016. "Testing the Validity of Assumptions of UC-ARIMA Models for Trend-Cycle Decompositions," Working and Discussion Papers WP 4/2016, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
    16. Zacharias Psaradakis & Marián Vávra, 2022. "Using Triples to Assess Symmetry Under Weak Dependence," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1538-1551, October.
    17. Christian Bontemps & Nour Meddahi, 2012. "Testing distributional assumptions: A GMM aproach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 978-1012, September.
    18. Pelagatti, Matteo M. & Sen, Pranab K., 2013. "Rank tests for short memory stationarity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 90-105.
    19. Cees Diks & Valentyn Panchenko & Dick van Dijk, 2008. "Partial Likelihood-Based Scoring Rules for Evaluating Density Forecasts in Tails," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-050/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Görtz, Christoph & Yeromonahos, Mallory, 2022. "Asymmetries in risk premia, macroeconomic uncertainty and business cycles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:7:y:2013:i:8:p:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.