IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v5y2011i5p87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Software Engineering Project Management – A Novel Approach for Software Engineering Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Caulfield
  • David Veal
  • Stanislaw Maj

Abstract

In response to real and perceived short-comings in the quality and productivity of software engineering practices and projects, professionally-endorsed graduate and post-graduate curriculum guides have been developed to meet technical developments and evolving industry demands. Each of these curriculum guidelines identify better software project management skills as critical for all graduating students, but they provide little guidance on how to achieve this. One possible way is to use a serious game — a game designed to teach and educate players about some of the dynamic complexities of the field in a safe and inexpensive environment. This paper presents the results of a qualitative research project that used a simple game of a software project to see if and how games could contribute to better software project management education. Initial results suggest that suitably-designed games are able to teach software engineering and project management concepts at higher-order Bloom taxonomy levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Caulfield & David Veal & Stanislaw Maj, 2011. "Teaching Software Engineering Project Management – A Novel Approach for Software Engineering Programs," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(5), pages 1-87, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:5:y:2011:i:5:p:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/11397/8794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/11397
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clayton J. Thomas & Walter L. Deemer, 1957. "The Role of Operational Gaming in Operations Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craig Caulfield & Jianhong Xia & David Veal & Stanislaw Maj, 2011. "A Systematic Survey of Games Used for Software Engineering Education," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(6), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Koppl, 2023. "Public health and expert failure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 101-124, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:5:y:2011:i:5:p:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.