IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v3y2009i8p76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Portfolio Selection Models with Uncertain Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Limei Yan

Abstract

This paper provides two new models for portfolio selection in which the securities are assumed to be uncertain variables that are neither random nor fuzzy. Since there is no efficient method to solve the proposed models, the original problems are transformed into their crisp equivalents programming when the returns are chosen some special uncertain variables such as rectangular uncertain variable, triangular uncertain variable, trapezoidal uncertain variable and normal uncertain variable. Finally, its feasibility and effectiveness of the method is illustrated by numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Limei Yan, 2009. "Optimal Portfolio Selection Models with Uncertain Returns," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(8), pages 1-76, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:8:p:76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/3513/3190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/3513
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Best & Jaroslava Hlouskova, 2000. "The efficient frontier for bounded assets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 52(2), pages 195-212, November.
    2. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2007. "Two new models for portfolio selection with stochastic returns taking fuzzy information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 396-405, July.
    3. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2008. "Portfolio selection with a new definition of risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 351-357, April.
    4. Deng, Xiao-Tie & Li, Zhong-Fei & Wang, Shou-Yang, 2005. "A minimax portfolio selection strategy with equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 278-292, October.
    5. Crama, Y. & Schyns, M., 2003. "Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 546-571, November.
    6. Mao, James C. T., 1970. "Models of Capital Budgeting, E-V VS E-S," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(5), pages 657-675, January.
    7. Grootveld, Henk & Hallerbach, Winfried, 1999. "Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 304-319, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2008. "Portfolio selection with a new definition of risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 351-357, April.
    2. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    3. Wei Chen & Yun Wang & Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat, 2018. "A hybrid FA–SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolio selection with transaction costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 129-147, October.
    4. Levy, Haim & Levy, Moshe, 2014. "The benefits of differential variance-based constraints in portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 372-381.
    5. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2013. "Fuzzy portfolio optimization model under real constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 704-711.
    6. Wei Chen, 2009. "Weighted portfolio selection models based on possibility theory," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 115-127, June.
    7. Ravi Kashyap, 2024. "The Blockchain Risk Parity Line: Moving From The Efficient Frontier To The Final Frontier Of Investments," Papers 2407.09536, arXiv.org.
    8. Joëts, Marc, 2015. "Heterogeneous beliefs, regret, and uncertainty: The role of speculation in energy price dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 204-215.
    9. Gumsong Jo & Hyokil Kim & Hoyong Kim & Gyongho Ri, 2024. "Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Using Stochastic Correlation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1493-1509, April.
    10. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather, 2012. "Portfolio selection using mean-risk model and mean-risk diversification model," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 324-342.
    11. Chen, Wei & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2010. "The admissible portfolio selection problem with transaction costs and an improved PSO algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(10), pages 2070-2076.
    12. Huang, Xiaoxia, 2007. "Two new models for portfolio selection with stochastic returns taking fuzzy information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 396-405, July.
    13. Smimou, K., 2014. "International portfolio choice and political instability risk: A multi-objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 546-560.
    14. Sévi, Benoît, 2014. "Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using intraday data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 643-659.
    15. Esther Mohr & Robert Dochow, 2017. "Risk management strategies for finding universal portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 129-147, September.
    16. Massol, Olivier & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2014. "Export diversification through resource-based industrialization: The case of natural gas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1067-1082.
    17. Buckley, Winston S. & Brown, Garfield O. & Marshall, Mario, 2012. "A mispricing model of stocks under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 584-592.
    18. Limei Yan, 2009. "Chance-constrained Programming Model for Portfolio Selection in Uncertain Environment," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(10), pages 1-89, October.
    19. Shushang Zhu & Duan Li & Shouyang Wang, 2009. "Robust portfolio selection under downside risk measures," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(7), pages 869-885.
    20. Lin Chen & Jin Peng & Bo Zhang & Isnaini Rosyida, 2017. "Diversified models for portfolio selection based on uncertain semivariance," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 637-648, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:3:y:2009:i:8:p:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.