IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v12y2018i2p54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grey Wolf Algorithm for Requirements Prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • Raja Masadeh
  • Abdullah Alzaqebah
  • Amjad Hudaib

Abstract

Requirement prioritization is one of the most important approach in the process of requirement engineering due to use it in order to prioritize the execution sort of requirements with taking into account the viewpoints of stakeholders. Thus, in this study, grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm is applied in order to prioritize the requirements of a software project. GWO imitates the hunting behavior of grey wolves in nature. Which distinct from others that it has dominant leadership hierarchy which contains four main types; alpha, beta delta and omega wolves. In this paper, a proposed algorithm is presented to prioritize the requirements into ordered list. Furthermore, it is compared and evaluated with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique in terms of average running time and dataset size. The findings display that the RP-GWO performs better than AHP mechanism by approximately (30%).

Suggested Citation

  • Raja Masadeh & Abdullah Alzaqebah & Amjad Hudaib, 2018. "Grey Wolf Algorithm for Requirements Prioritization," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-54, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/72672/40065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/72672
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amjad Hudaib & Raja Masadeh & Mais Qasem & Abdullah Alzaqebah, 2018. "Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-62, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amjad Hudaib & Raja Masadeh & Mais Qasem & Abdullah Alzaqebah, 2018. "Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-62, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo Sáinz-Ruiz & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2022. "Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.