IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v5y2013i11p208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporation of Milk Yield, Dry Matter Intake and Phosphorous Excretion Predictive Functions in the Development of a Multi-Objective Dairy Feed Formulation Software Program

Author

Listed:
  • S Mutua
  • B Bebe
  • A Kahi
  • A Guliye

Abstract

Predictive functions for milk yield, dry matter intake, and phosphorous-manure derived from the National Research Council 2001 and the present study were incorporated in the development of a multiple objective dairy feed formulation software program (MoF-Dairy Edition-2010); that attempted to optimise feed cost, milk yield and profits while minimising Phosphorous-excretion in manure. Important objects in the feed milling industry considered in the program development were feed millers, dairy farmers, and government feed policy regulatory guidelines. The multi-objective formulation approach comprises hierarchical design levels which include data, model, tools, and output layers. Program database objects are manipulated using VB.NET programming language within a Microsoft .NET Framework Environment. Users interact with the program by providing individual details after which a customer system instance is created. Program formulation inputs are entered through VB forms linked to the core simulation model layer (Microsoft SQL Server Database) to automatically calculate and generate nutrient requirements in accordance with NRC, 2001 for the particular cow or cow production groups under specified production performance parameters. The final solution is obtained by allowing the program to solve for the most feasible combination of available ingredients under the imposed formulation, ingredient as well as nutrient constraints. Program outputs include tailor-made reports on feed formulae; and the accompanying physical nutrient compositions and nutrient deviation analysis; potential unit and gross P-manure environmental pollution, and business economic analysis; detailing concentrate supplementation rates per cow per milking as well as the corresponding projected daily milk profit margins.

Suggested Citation

  • S Mutua & B Bebe & A Kahi & A Guliye, 2013. "Incorporation of Milk Yield, Dry Matter Intake and Phosphorous Excretion Predictive Functions in the Development of a Multi-Objective Dairy Feed Formulation Software Program," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(11), pages 208-208, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:11:p:208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/12619/18308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/12619
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:jagaec:v:40:y:2008:i:1:p:287-300_24 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lara, Pablo, 1993. "Multiple objective fractional programming and livestock ration formulation: A case study for dairy cow diets in Spain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 321-334.
    3. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Roy Black, J. & Harsh, Stephen B., 2008. "Incorporating Environmentally Compliant Manure Nutrient Disposal Costs into Least-Cost Livestock Ration Formulation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 287-300, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmit, Todd M. & Verteramo, Leslie & Tomek, William G., 2009. "Implications of Growing Biofuel Demands on Northeast Livestock Feed Costs," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 200-212, October.
    2. Zgajnar, Jaka & Kavcic, Stane, 2011. "Weighted Goal Programming and Penalty Functions: Whole-farm Planning Approach Under Risk," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 118033, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Enahoro, D. & Schmit, T.M. & Boisvert, R.N., 2016. "Assessment Of New York’S Pollution Discharge Elimination Permits For Cafo’S: A Regional Analysis," Working Papers 250026, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Castrodeza, Carmen & Lara, Pablo & Pena, Teresa, 2005. "Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 76-96, October.
    5. Babic, Zoran & Peric, Tunjo, 2011. "Optimization of livestock feed blend by use of goal programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 218-223, April.
    6. Lara, P. & Stancu-Minasian, I., 1999. "Fractional programming: a tool for the assessment of sustainability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 131-141, November.
    7. De Matteis, Maria C. & Yu, T. Edward & Boyer, Christopher N. & DeLong, Karen L. & Smith, Jason, 2018. "Economic and environmental implications of incorporating distillers’ dried grains with solubles in feed rations of growing and finishing swine in Argentina," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    8. Jones, Crystal & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Black, J. Roy & Rust, Steven R., 2007. "Economically Optimal Distiller Grain Inclusion in Beef Feedlot Rations: Recognition of Omitted Factors," 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois 37574, NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    9. Tozer, P. R. & Stokes, J. R., 2001. "A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 201-215, March.
    10. J. Žgajnar & L. Juvančič & S. Kavčič, 2009. "Combination of linear and weighted goal programming with penalty function in optimisation of a daily dairy cow ration," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 492-500.
    11. Gebrezgabher, Solomie A. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2014. "A multiple criteria decision making approach to manure management systems in the Netherlands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 643-653.
    12. Rosshairy Abd. Rahman & Graham Kendall & Razamin Ramli & Zainoddin Jamari & Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud, 2017. "Shrimp Feed Formulation via Evolutionary Algorithm with Power Heuristics for Handling Constraints," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:5:y:2013:i:11:p:208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.