IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v16y2024i9p59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Are University Incubated Agribusinesses: A Sustainability Description of University Incubated Agribusinesses in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Racheal G. Nakiganda
  • Dickson Okello
  • Hillary K. Bett
  • Patience M. Mshega

Abstract

Universities are promoting entrepreneurship incubation as a means of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset and creation of business ventures among university students. This is necessitated by the bulging youth unemployment among university graduates in the world and most sub-Saharan African countries. This initiative aims at creating graduates who are job creators and not job seekers. Despite these efforts, youth unemployment rates continue to rise among most graduates. Moreover, most university-incubated youth-led businesses have a high failure rate with a majority of them not seeing a second birthday. To address this issue, the study sought to examine the nature of incubated agribusinesses and their sustainability performance in seven selected universities in Kenya. A multistage sampling procedure technique along with Cochran’s (1963) formula for determining populations that are large and unknown were used to select 272 respondents whose businesses were incubated at their universities. Using an index and descriptive statistics, University Incubated agribusinesses in Kenya on average exist for only one year and five months. Results also revealed that the university-incubated agribusinesses under study were 68.2% sustainable indicating a fair performance. They revealed a higher performance in social sustainability (72.8% of its dimensional scores) as compared to economic and environmental sustainability (65.2% and 70% respectively of their dimensional scores). To ensure the long-term success of university-incubated youth agribusinesses, the study recommends that university business incubators should assess the expectations of their participants before they enroll them. The study also suggests that universities should create standardized policies, and procedures governing all stages of incubation. Moreover, youths with university-incubated agribusinesses need to intensify their economic, social, and environmental practices and strategies to ensure the holistic sustainability of their agribusinesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Racheal G. Nakiganda & Dickson Okello & Hillary K. Bett & Patience M. Mshega, 2024. "What Are University Incubated Agribusinesses: A Sustainability Description of University Incubated Agribusinesses in Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(9), pages 1-59, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/50521/54724
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/50521
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Kolvereid, 2018. "Entrepreneurship among parents," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Disha Bhanot & Varadraj Bapat, 2015. "Sustainability index of micro finance institutions (MFIs) and contributory factors," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 387-403, April.
    3. Disha Bhanot & Varadraj Bapat, 2015. "Sustainability index of micro finance institutions (MFIs) and contributory factors," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 387-403, April.
    4. Axèle Giroud & Jacqueline Salguero Huaman, . "Investment in agriculture and gender equality in developing countries," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    5. Oluwayemisi Adebola Abisuga-Oyekunle & Swapan Kumar Patra & Mammo Muchie, 2020. "SMEs in sustainable development: Their role in poverty reduction and employment generation in sub-Saharan Africa," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 405-419, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niels Hermes & Marek Hudon, 2018. "Determinants Of The Performance Of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1483-1513, December.
    2. Wei Xu & Hongyong Fu & Huanpeng Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Microfinance Institutions Considering Macro-Environmental Factors: A Cross-Country Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Abrego, Adriana & Guizar, Isai, 2017. "Resilience of Agricultural Microfinance Institutions to Rainfall Shocks," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258031, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Syeda Sonia Parvin & Belayet Hossain & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Qingfeng Cao, 2020. "Capital Structure, Financial Performance, and Sustainability of Micro-Finance Institutions (MFIs) in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Nur Chasanah & Indra Gunawan & Bassam Baroudi, 2024. "Post‐project sustainability evaluation by using a complex systems approach: A framework and an application to a revolving loan fund (microfinance) project in Indonesia," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 274-300, March.
    6. Elizabeth Mkandawire & Melody Mentz-Coetzee & Margaret Najjingo Mangheni & Eleonora Barusi, 2021. "Enhancing the Glopan Food Systems Framework by Integrating Gender: Relevance for Women in African Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Dilruba Khanam & Syeda Sonia Parvin & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Asadul Hoque & Zhan Su, 2018. "Financial Sustainability of Non-Governmental Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): A Cost-Efficiency Analysis of BRAC, ASA, and PROSHIKA from Bangladesh," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 12, pages 43-56, May.
    8. Girma Jirata Duguma & Jiqin Han, 2018. "Effect of Deposit Mobilization on the Financial Sustainability of Rural Saving and Credit Cooperatives: Evidence from Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Hermes, Cornelis & Hudon, M., 2018. "Determinants of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Research Report 2018008, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Luu Tien Dung & Tran Thi Hoang Dung, 2024. "Businesses model innovation: a key role in the internationalisation of SMEs in the era of digitalisation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Nor Azmawati Husain & Intan Maizura Abd Rashid & Norshiba Norhisham & Nor Hamiza Mohd Noor & Noraishah Kamarolzaman, 2023. "The Effect of Conceptual Factors on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Business Success in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 264-274.
    12. Catherine W. Gathitu & Dr David Kabata & Dr Grace Kiiru, 2024. "Influence of Government Sponsored Enterprise Funds-Credit Services on the Growth of Group-Based Micro and Small Enterprises in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 1326-1340, February.
    13. Maeenuddin & Shaari Abd Hamid & Annuar MD Nassir & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2024. "Measuring the Financial Sustainability and its Influential Factors in Microfinance Sector of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
    14. Essy C. Kirui & Michael M. Kidoido & Daniel M. Mutyambai & Dickson O. Okello & Komivi S. Akutse, 2023. "Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding the Use of Agroecological-Based Pest Management Practices in Crucifers and Traditional African Vegetable (TAV) Production in Kenya and Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.