IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v10y2018i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Won’t They Exercise More? Development of a Tool to Assess Motivators and Barriers to Exercise in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Moss
  • Mark Moss
  • Lynn McInnes

Abstract

Objectives The aim was to develop a quantitative tool to measure perceived motivators and barriers to exercise amongst older adults in order to facilitate the development of bespoke interventions. Methods Focus groups conducted with participants over the age of 65 informed the initial development of a 56-item Motivators and Barriers Questionnaire (MBQ). This was administered to a second sample of 72 sedentary and active older adults (65 to 90 years). Results Principle components analysis resulted in five factors defined as motivators to exercise and six factors representing barriers to exercise. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the model as assessed by RMSEA criteria. Discussion These findings suggest that the MBQ may help to identify an individual’s ‘profile’ of motivators and barriers to exercise, and so inform personalized interventions that might successfully increase activity levels in adults over 65 years of age when compared to standardised approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Moss & Mark Moss & Lynn McInnes, 2018. "Why Won’t They Exercise More? Development of a Tool to Assess Motivators and Barriers to Exercise in Older Adults," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-1, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/71734/39915
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/71734
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne-Marie Aish & Karl Jöreskog, 1990. "A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: an application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 405-426, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Isabel Polo Peña & Dolores María Frías Jamilena & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Molina, 2017. "The effects of perceived value on loyalty: the moderating effect of market orientation adoption," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(1), pages 93-116, March.
    2. J. Robert Baum & Barbara J. Bird, 2010. "The Successful Intelligence of High-Growth Entrepreneurs: Links to New Venture Growth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 397-412, April.
    3. Manuel Sánchez Pérez, 1996. "A strategy for the assessment of overall model fit in structural equation modeling for business economics," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 6, pages 183-210, Diciembre.
    4. Karl Jöreskog, 1994. "On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 381-389, September.
    5. Zhijun Pei & Yingchun Pan & Martin Skitmore, 2018. "Political Efficacy, Social Network and Involvement in Public Deliberation in Rural China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 453-471, September.
    6. Žabkar, Vesna & Brenčič, Maja Makovec & Dmitrović, Tanja, 2010. "Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 537-546.
    7. Bradley Jorgensen & Geoffrey Syme & Brian Bishop & Blair Nancarrow, 1999. "Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 131-150, July.
    8. Carla Carvalho & Lisete Mónico & Ana Pinto & Soraia Oliveira & Eduardo Leite, 2024. "Effects of Work–Family Conflict and Facilitation Profiles on Work Engagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Gülhayat Şimşek & Fatma Noyan, 2012. "Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1571-1581, August.
    10. Niranjan Narasimhan & Kumar Bhaskar & Srinivas Prakhya, 2010. "Existential Beliefs and Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 369-382, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.