IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v8y2016i11p155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Review of Asset Pricing Models for the Japanese Share Market

Author

Listed:
  • Brooke Maeda

Abstract

This paper conducts an empirical review of asset pricing models for the Japanese share market. Researchers are continually attempting to describe a model which explains share returns and share anomalies more accurately. This paper reviews financial literature which applies the most common models to the Japanese share market and analyzes their robustness. Based on the performance of the four models, the characteristics which appear to be significant to the Japanese share market are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooke Maeda, 2016. "An Empirical Review of Asset Pricing Models for the Japanese Share Market," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 155-155, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/62724/34367
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/62724
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Novy-Marx, Robert, 2013. "The other side of value: The gross profitability premium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-28.
    2. Titman, Sheridan & Wei, K. C. John & Xie, Feixue, 2004. "Capital Investments and Stock Returns," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 677-700, December.
    3. Yonezawa, Yasuhiro & Hin, Tio Kia, 1992. "An empirical test of the CAPM on the stocks listed on the Tokyo stock exchange," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 145-161, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Muddasir & Gülşah Kulalı, 2024. "The Validity of CAPM and ICAPM in the Istanbul Stock Exchange," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 9(1), pages 26-42.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brooke Alexandra Maeda, 2016. "An Empirical Review of Asset Pricing Models for the Japanese Share Market," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 155-158, November.
    2. JULES H. van BINSBERGEN & CHRISTIAN C. OPP, 2019. "Real Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1659-1706, August.
    3. Christian Fieberg & Daniel Metko & Thorsten Poddig & Thomas Loy, 2023. "Machine learning techniques for cross-sectional equity returns’ prediction," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 289-323, March.
    4. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals and Investment Strategies: The Profitability of Using Five-Factor Fama-French Alphas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Geertsema, Paul & Lu, Helen, 2020. "The correlation structure of anomaly strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Shafiqur Rahman & Matthew J. Schneider, 2019. "Tests of Alternative Asset Pricing Models Using Individual Security Returns and a New Multivariate F-Test," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-34, March.
    7. Jiaju Miao & Pawel Polak, 2023. "Online Ensemble of Models for Optimal Predictive Performance with Applications to Sector Rotation Strategy," Papers 2304.09947, arXiv.org.
    8. de Oliveira Souza, Thiago, 2020. "Observable implications of the conditional CAPM," Discussion Papers on Economics 13/2020, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    9. Juhani T. Linnainmaa & Michael R. Roberts, 2016. "The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns," NBER Working Papers 22894, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lou, Dong & Polk, Christopher & Skouras, Spyros, 2019. "A tug of war: Overnight versus intraday expected returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 192-213.
    11. Cheema, Muhammad A. & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2019. "Oil prices and stock market anomalies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 578-587.
    12. Sina Ehsani & Juhani T. Linnainmaa, 2019. "Factor Momentum and the Momentum Factor," NBER Working Papers 25551, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Xiaomeng Lu & Robert F. Stambaugh & Yu Yuan, 2017. "Anomalies Abroad: Beyond Data Mining," NBER Working Papers 23809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Anginer, Deniz & Ray, Sugata & Seyhun, H. Nejat & Xu, Luqi, 2024. "Expensive anomalies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Kewei Hou & Haitao Mo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2019. "Which Factors?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-35.
    16. Li, Yuming, 2018. "Investment and profitability versus value and momentum: The price of residual risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-10.
    17. Michal Gnap, 2022. "Problems Related to the Capital Assets Pricing Model on the Warsaw Stock Exchange: Applications of the 5-Factor Fama and French Model," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(36), pages 4-14.
    18. Miralles-Quirós, José Luis & Miralles-Quirós, María Mar, 2024. "Factor models and investment strategies in the renewable energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Ayşe İmrohoroğlu & Şelale Tüzel, 2014. "Firm-Level Productivity, Risk, and Return," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 2073-2090, August.
    20. Guo, Bin & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Yongjie & Zhang, Han, 2017. "The five-factor asset pricing model tests for the Chinese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 84-106.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.