IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahs/journl/v9y2024i1p26-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Validity of CAPM and ICAPM in the Istanbul Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Muddasir
  • Gülşah Kulalı

Abstract

This study aims to answer the following research question: Are the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and International Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM) valid in the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE)? No broad agreement has been reached in the literature on this question, yet. Using an unbalanced panel of daily stock returns of companies in the BIST-30 index and as of BIST-100 index from March 2010 to February 2019, this paper seeks to provide new evidence on this discussion and explores whether the risk-expected return relationship is linear. In the empirical framework, panel regression analysis methodology is employed. Our findings indicate that both linear CAPM and linear ICAPM models are valid in ISE. Moreover, it is observed that the ICAPM outperforms the CAPM in explaining the stock returns for both indices. This outperformance is especially more pronounced for BIST-30 than BIST-100. Depending on these findings, investors can easily prioritize BIST-100 over BIST-30 when constructing portfolios to reduce risk in the Turkish market, given the fact that exchange rate-relevant diversification is greater in BIST-100.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Muddasir & Gülşah Kulalı, 2024. "The Validity of CAPM and ICAPM in the Istanbul Stock Exchange," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 9(1), pages 26-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:26-42
    DOI: 10.30784/epfad.1383837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3507332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30784/epfad.1383837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brooke Maeda, 2016. "An Empirical Review of Asset Pricing Models for the Japanese Share Market," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 155-155, November.
    2. Bianconi, Marcelo & MacLachlan, Scott & Sammon, Marco, 2015. "Implied volatility and the risk-free rate of return in options markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-26.
    3. Brooke Alexandra Maeda, 2016. "An Empirical Review of Asset Pricing Models for the Japanese Share Market," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 155-158, November.
    4. Foerster, Stephen R. & Sapp, Stephen G., 2005. "Valuation of financial versus non-financial firms: a global perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arısoy, Yakup Eser & Altay-Salih, Aslıhan & Akdeniz, Levent, 2015. "Aggregate volatility expectations and threshold CAPM," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 231-253.
    2. Menz, Klaus-Michael, 2010. "Market discipline and the evaluation of Euro financial bonds--An empirical analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 315-328, September.
    3. Soana, Maria Gaia, 2024. "Environmental strategies, environmental performance and board sustainability committees: Are financial and non-financial companies different?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Kerstin Lopatta & Thomas Kaspereit, 2014. "The World Capital Markets’ Perception of Sustainability and the Impact of the Financial Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 475-500, July.
    5. Dirk Broeders & Marleen de Jonge & David Rijsbergen, 2024. "The European Carbon Bond Premium," Working Papers 798, DNB.
    6. Merdad, Hesham Jamil & Kabir Hassan, M. & Hippler, William J., 2015. "The Islamic risk factor in expected stock returns: an empirical study in Saudi Arabia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-314.
    7. Jiongye Jin & Jianing Zhang, 2023. "The Stock Performance of Green Bond Issuers During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of China," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(1), pages 211-230, March.
    8. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Mohsni, Sana, 2010. "Capital returns, costs and EVA for Canadian firms," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 256-273, December.
    9. Bessler, Wolfgang & Kurmann, Philipp, 2014. "Bank risk factors and changing risk exposures: Capital market evidence before and during the financial crisis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 151-166.
    10. Sepúlveda Velásquez, Jorge & Tapia Griñen, Pablo & Pastén Henríquez, Boris, 2023. "Mandatory dividends and economic policy uncertainty: A challenge for investment opportunities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Magomet Yandiev, 2021. "Risk-Free Rate in the Covid-19 Pandemic: Application Mistakes and Conclusions for Traders," Papers 2111.07075, arXiv.org.
    12. Wang, Ximei & Zhao, Yanlong & Bao, Ying, 2019. "Arbitrage-free conditions for implied volatility surface by Delta," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 819-834.
    13. Lin, Shin-Hung & Huang, Hung-Hsi & Li, Sheng-Han, 2015. "Option pricing under truncated Gram–Charlier expansion," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 77-97.
    14. Aydin Aslan & Lars Poppe & Peter Posch, 2021. "Are Sustainable Companies More Likely to Default? Evidence from the Dynamics between Credit and ESG Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ISE; CAPM; ICAPM; Exchange Rate; Emerging Markets; Panel Data Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:26-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ersan Ersoy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://epfjournal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.