IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v15y2021i4p201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Proposal for Innovation Indicators: A Study of the World’s Largest Patent Producing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliano Carlo Rainatto
  • Orlando Roque Silva
  • Norberto Almeida de Andrade
  • Evandro de Almeida
  • Pedro Dornas Cipriani
  • Thiago Saboya
  • Rodrigo Teixeira Conceicao
  • Wellington Fernando Bastos

Abstract

Innovation has become an eloquent topic among researchers and the market, but it is important to understand where we are innovating and at what costs and how efficiently this has been done. Promoting innovation performance index based on patent production, R&D investment and the number of researchers being a tool to assist managers in measuring how the resource is used. According to the analysis made using the countries in the list of the top 10(ten) patent applicants, we have identified that the first place is not the most efficient in employing researchers by a patent granted or in the efficiency of the resource employed vs. the granting of patents. This study shows that much of the resource that has been employed with researchers and research has a low return for the country. The money invested by Rep. Korea, showed the best efficiency in volume of researchers producing innovation, and China presents the best numbers in volume of production, and money by patent applied. Research has shown that eastern countries are at the forefront of researcher performance index and dressed in the production of a patent, bringing efficiency to the resources employed.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliano Carlo Rainatto & Orlando Roque Silva & Norberto Almeida de Andrade & Evandro de Almeida & Pedro Dornas Cipriani & Thiago Saboya & Rodrigo Teixeira Conceicao & Wellington Fernando Bastos, 2021. "A New Proposal for Innovation Indicators: A Study of the World’s Largest Patent Producing Countries," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 201-201, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:4:p:201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/42367/44166
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/42367
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Gibbons & Robert S. Kaplan, 2015. "Formal Measures in Informal Management: Can a Balanced Scorecard Change a Culture?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 447-451, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret A. Abernethy & Chung-Yu Hung & Laurence van Lent, 2020. "Expertise and Discretionary Bonus Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 415-432, January.
    2. Ola Kvaløy & Trond E. Olsen, 2023. "Balanced Scorecards: A Relational Contract Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 619-652, May.
    3. Anja Prummer, "undated". "Discrimination in Promotion," Working Papers 905, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Volker Stein & Arnd Wiedemann, 2016. "Risk governance: conceptualization, tasks, and research agenda," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(8), pages 813-836, November.
    5. Graham, John R. & Grennan, Jillian & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shivaram, 2022. "Corporate culture: Evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 552-593.
    6. Chih-Chao Chung & Li-Chung Chao & Chih-Hong Chen & Shi-Jer Lou, 2016. "A Balanced Scorecard of Sustainable Management in the Taiwanese Bicycle Industry: Development of Performance Indicators and Importance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Bei Liu & Hong Chen & Shiyan Jiang & Qingqing Sun, 2021. "Why Can’t I Work in a Green Way? Research on the Influencing Mechanism of Employees’ Labor Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Mitra, Sovan & Lim, Sungmook & Karathanasopoulos, Andreas, 2019. "Regression based scenario generation: Applications for performance management," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    9. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens & Christian Hofmann & Laurence Lent, 2023. "Altruism, social norms, and incentive contract design," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 570-614, June.
    10. Claude Ménard, 2018. "Organization and governance in the agrifood sector: How can we capture their variety?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 142-160, December.
    11. Juan‐José Ganuza & Fernando Gomez, 2022. "Designing relational sanctions in buyer–supplier relationships," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 470-491, April.
    12. Kopytova, Iryna & Zelinska, Antonina, 2017. "Оцінка Ефективності Діяльності Управлінського Персоналу : Зміст І Соціально-Психологічні Аспекти," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 3(3), September.
    13. Demartini, Maria Chiara & Otley, David, 2020. "Beyond the system vs. package dualism in Performance Management Systems design: A loose coupling approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:4:p:201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.