IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v15y2021i10p117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and Prioritizing the Critical Success Factors and Delays of Project Management Implementation: Empirical Evidence at Construction Projects in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Majd Mohammad Omoush

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to examine and then prioritize the critical success factors (CSFs) and delay reasons across the project management implementation stage. The study adopted the qualitative approach to introduce a full classification of the CSFs and delay reasons in project management. A total of 44 articles were reviewed to mine the various CSFs and delays based on conclusions of previous literature. This review leads to define a matrix of factors that are aligned with the project management in the context of the Jordanian construction project. Besides, the questionnaire instrument was designed based on outcomes of the critical analysis of literature; this instrument was administrated to a sample of 198 respondents across 20 Jordanian construction projects. The study sample entailed project managers, engineers, and senior department heads who were asked to assess the relevance and importance of the extracted CFSs. The questionnaire instrument was designed based on a 5-points Likert scale. Further, the data analysis was conducted based on the means values of the responses. The literature review resulted in categorizing the factors into five groups, namely, human’s related factors, organizational and managerial, material factor, project-related factors, and the external environment and stakeholders’ factors. This research applied a taxonomy approach to classifying the mean values throughout three ideas, namely, the classification of the major success factors and delays, the exploration of the sub success factors and delays within each significant factor, and last the exploration of the most critical sub success factors and delays regardless of the significant factor they are linked to this group. According to the analyses results, the major success factors were evaluated based on priority ranking, and the results showed that the projects related factors group was the most crucial motive of either success or delays. Still, human-related factors were the least important factors group; however, the “coherent team.” was the most sub factor evaluated. For the organizational and managerial sub-factors, the functional manager support was the most evaluated subfactor. Last, the materials sub-factor of the availability of materials was ranked as the most subfactor evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Majd Mohammad Omoush, 2021. "Assessing and Prioritizing the Critical Success Factors and Delays of Project Management Implementation: Empirical Evidence at Construction Projects in Jordan," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(10), pages 117-117, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:10:p:117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/43810/46075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/43810
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randall L. Schultz & Dennis P. Slevin & Jeffrey K. Pinto, 1987. "Strategy and Tactics in a Process Model of Project Implementation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 34-46, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rivera González Gibrán & Cox Andrew M. & Flores Zambada Ricardo, 2012. "A human resources project implementation An actor-network theory perspective," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(3), pages 9-39, julio-sep.
    2. Wei Wang & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Adoption and Diffusion of GBTS in the Construction Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu, 2016. "Critical Success Factors For Infrastructure European Funded Projects," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 888-898, July.
    4. Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Cristian-Eugen Luchian & Iuliana Luchian, 2017. "Quality Management in Project Management Consulting. A Case Study in an International Consulting Company," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 215-215, February.
    5. Seok-Keun Yoo & Bo-Young Kim, 2018. "A Decision-Making Model for Adopting a Cloud Computing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Kotiadis, K. & Tako, A.A., 2018. "Facilitated post-model coding in discrete event simulation (DES): A case study in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1120-1133.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:10:p:117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.