IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v15y2022i4p88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Strategy for the Recovery of Overdue Portfolio in the Textile Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Medina-Sánchez Johanna Lizbeth
  • Altamirano-Hidalgo Mario Roberto

Abstract

The overdue portfolio is the accounts receivable that a company has, whose payment date has already expired and has not yet been collected. Its proper management represents a fundamental aspect both in the financial planning and in the entity's growth, as it reflects possible significant risks in its finances. This study aims to propose a strategy for the mitigation of the overdue portfolio and its economic impact on the textile sector. In this sense, it is evident that the null or deficient policies of cash sales or credit, and of the latter in turn of extrajudicial and judicial collection policies, affect the correct presentation of the financial statements, directly affecting the company's economy, which leads to stagnation in production and sales. Therefore, the need to prioritize efficient collection management is corroborated. The descriptive methodology was used through four stages for the interpretive analysis of bibliographic documents. Theoretical methods such as logical history, synthesis analysis, inductive deductive, and empirical were used. Finally, as a result, a reference framework is obtained on which alternatives, and corrective actions can be managed and implemented that will allow the business sector, as well as the accounting, financial and legal areas, to enhance their strengths, for the proper management of sales and the prevention of uncollectible overdue portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Medina-Sánchez Johanna Lizbeth & Altamirano-Hidalgo Mario Roberto, 2022. "Methodological Strategy for the Recovery of Overdue Portfolio in the Textile Sector," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 1-88, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/46978/50240
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/46978
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louhichi, Awatef & Boujelbene, Younes, 2016. "Credit risk, managerial behaviour and macroeconomic equilibrium within dual banking systems: Interest-free vs. interest-based banking industries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 104-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Interest-free versus Conventional banks- A Comparative Study using Linear and Nonlinear Panel Regression: Empirical Evidence from Turky and 6 MENA countries," MPRA Paper 101028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Morakinyo Akinola & Muller Colette & Sibanda Mabutho, 2018. "Non-Performing Loans, Banking System and Macroeconomy," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(2), pages 67-86, August.
    3. Rouetbi, Marwene & Ftiti, Zied & Omri, Abdelwahed, 2023. "The impact of displaced commercial risk on the performance of Islamic banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Long run comparison analysis and Short run Stability sensitivity: Empirical Evidence from Tunisian Banks," MPRA Paper 101029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Fadoua Joudar & Zouheir Msatfa & Olaya Metwalli & Maha Mouabid & Brahim Dinar, 2023. "Islamic Financial Stability Factors: An Econometric Evidence," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Sutrisno Sutrisno & Agus Widarjono, 2022. "Is Profit–Loss-Sharing Financing Matter for Islamic Bank’s Profitability? The Indonesian Case," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    7. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Different dimensions Bank performance comparisons IBs vs CBs – Quatar case," MPRA Paper 101375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ibrahim, Mansor H. & Rizvi, Syed Aun R., 2018. "Bank lending, deposits and risk-taking in times of crisis: A panel analysis of Islamic and conventional banks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 31-47.
    9. Boutheina Bannour & Asma Sghaier & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2020. "How to Choose a Nonparametric Frontier Model? Technical Efficiency of Turkish Banks Assessing Global," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 348-364, April.
    10. Ardit Gjeçi & Matej Marinč & Vasja Rant, 2023. "Non-performing loans and bank lending behaviour," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Faridah Najuna Misman & M. Ishaq Bhatti, 2020. "The Determinants of Credit Risk: An Evidence from ASEAN and GCC Islamic Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Louhichi, Awatef & Louati, Salma & Boujelbene, Younes, 2020. "The regulations–risk taking nexus under competitive pressure: What about the Islamic banking system?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    13. Hassan, M. Kabir & Aliyu, Sirajo, 2018. "A contemporary survey of islamic banking literature," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 12-43.
    14. MB Hendrie Anto & Faaza Fakhrunnas & Yunice Karina Tumewang, 2022. "Islamic banks credit risk performance for home financing: Before and during Covid-19 pandemic," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 14(1), pages 113-125.
    15. Kabir, Md. Nurul & Worthington, Andrew C., 2017. "The ‘competition–stability/fragility’ nexus: A comparative analysis of Islamic and conventional banks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 111-128.
    16. Alandejani, Maha & Asutay, Mehmet, 2017. "Nonperforming loans in the GCC banking sectors: Does the Islamic finance matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 832-854.
    17. Warninda, Titi Dewi & Ekaputra, Irwan Adi & Rokhim, Rofikoh, 2019. "Do Mudarabah and Musharakah financing impact Islamic Bank credit risk differently?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 166-175.
    18. Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Islam, Faridul & Verhoeven, Peter & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2022. "The impact of a dual banking system on macroeconomic efficiency," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Salma Louati & Younes Boujelbene, 2021. "Basel Regulations and Banks’ Risk-efficiency Nexus: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous-equation Models," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 578-602, October.
    20. Faridah Najuna Misman & Wahida Ahmad & Noor Sufiawati Khairani & Nur Hazimah Amran, 2020. "Credit Risk, Islamic Contracts and Ownership Status: Evidence From Malaysian Islamic Banks," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 106-114, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.