IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v11y2018i6p243-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of Material Misstatement in Fluctuated Economic Environments: The Case of Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Stamatios Dritsas
  • George Petrakos

Abstract

The aim of this paper is a) to investigate the relationship between the business risk and the risk of material misstatement at an overall financial level and b) to determine the dependencies between the risk of material misstatement and selected risk factors affecting pervasively the financial statements and many assertions. The study was based on data collected from a statistical survey among experienced statutory auditors employed by the five largest international audit firms in Greece. The research suggests a statistically significant relationship between the business risk and the risk of material misstatement at the overall financial statements level. Furthermore, although the majority of the survey participants believes that the recent financial crisis in Greece affected their assessments on going concern risk and the risk linked to accounting estimations substantially, the dependencies between those two risks and the risk of material misstatement at an overall financial statements level are not validated by the survey data.

Suggested Citation

  • Stamatios Dritsas & George Petrakos, 2018. "Risk of Material Misstatement in Fluctuated Economic Environments: The Case of Greece," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 243-248, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:243-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/72785/41794
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/72785
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reiner Quick, 2012. "EC Green Paper Proposals and Audit Quality," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 17-38, June.
    2. Quick, Reiner, 2012. "EC Green Paper Proposals and Audit Quality," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60560, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Luc Quadackers & Theodore Mock & Steven Maijoor, 1996. "Audit risk and audit programmes: archival evidence from four Dutch audit firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 217-237.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Bleibtreu & Stephan Ulrike Stefani, 2013. "The Effects of Mandatory Auditor Rotation on Low Balling Behavior and Auditor Independence," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2013-14, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    2. Patrick Velte & Carl-Christian Freidank, 2015. "The link between in- and external rotation of the auditor and the quality of financial accounting and external audit," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 225-246, October.
    3. Jean Damascene Mvunabandi & Haruna Maama, 2023. "The Impact of Ethics on the Audit Quality of Firms in Sub-Sahara Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 119-127, September.
    4. Laura Sierra & Ana Zorio & María A. García‐Benau, 2013. "Sustainable Development and Assurance of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Published by Ibex‐35 Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 359-370, November.
    5. Anna Samsonova-Taddei & Javed Siddiqui, 2016. "Regulation and the Promotion of Audit Ethics: Analysis of the Content of the EU’s Policy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 183-195, November.
    6. Florian Hoos & Jorien Louise Pruijssers & Michel W. Lander, 2019. "Who’s Watching? Accountability in Different Audit Regimes and the Effects on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 563-575, May.
    7. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    8. Justin Logie & Warren Maroun, 2021. "Evaluating Audit Quality Using the Results of Inspection Processes Performed by an Independent Regulator," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(2), pages 128-149, June.
    9. Mohamed M. El-Dyasty & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Multiple audit mechanism, audit quality and cost of debt: empirical evidence from a developing country," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 264-281, September.
    10. Ritchie, Bob & Khorwatt, Esamaddin, 2007. "The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 39-59.
    11. Michael De Martinis & Hironori Fukukawa & Theodore J. Mock, 2011. "Exploring the role of country and client type on the auditor's client risk assessments and audit planning decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(7), pages 543-565, July.
    12. Steven Maijoor & Roger Meuwissen & Luc Quadackers, 2000. "The effects of national institutions on audit research: evidence from Europe and North America," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 569-587.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    audit risk; financial statements; risk assessment; risk of material misstatement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:243-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.