IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v12y2022i4p18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality in Higher Education: Defining the Conceptual Contents and their Relative Predominance

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Papanthymou
  • Maria Darra

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the conceptual content of the term “quality” in higher education, as it emerges from the descriptions and discussions of authors, researchers, and experts in 22 scientific publications. The analysis of the qualitative data is based on the methodology of grounded theory. From the analysis, 21 major dimensions or characteristics of quality in higher education emerged due to their high frequency of occurrence, were subdivided into five broader categories- “learning environment”, “learning content”, “processes”, “students”, and “teachers”. According to the main findings, from the "learning environment" category, the dimension concerning psychosocial elements predominated in the literature. From the category "learning content", two dimensions prevailed (student-centred teaching and learning) and the dimension concerning taking an interest in and caring about students. From the "processes" category, the dimension concerning assessment prevailed. In the category "students", the dimension of improved learning outcomes was the most frequently observed, and finally, from the "teachers" category, two dimensions prevailed over the others, one concerning pedagogical skills and the other termed skills- emotional, management, reflection.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Papanthymou & Maria Darra, 2022. "Quality in Higher Education: Defining the Conceptual Contents and their Relative Predominance," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/47761/51252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/47761
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suzanne Young & Dale G. Shaw, 1999. "Profiles of Effective College and University Teachers," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 670-686, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Al-Busaidi & S. Aldhafri & O. Büyükyavuz, 2016. "Effective University Instructors as Perceived by Turkish and Omani University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, August.
    2. Alexandra Ileana Mutiu, 2013. "An Inquiry Into The Effects Of Multiple Graded Factors On Student Performance In Managerial Accounting," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(15), pages 1-5.
    3. Yeliz Eratlı Şirin & Mustafa Şahin, 2020. "Investigation of Factors Affecting the Achievement of University Students with Logistic Regression Analysis: School of Physical Education and Sport Example," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.