IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v8y2015i5p208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into Pragmatic Knowledge in the Reading Section of TOLIMO, TOEFL, and IELTS Examinations

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza Karbalaei
  • Mehrnaz Kashkooli Rahmanzade

Abstract

The present study focused on the analysis of listening sections of two international English proficiency tests, i.e. IELTS and TOEFL tests, and one local English proficiency test, i.e. TOLIMO from pragmatic perspective. An attempt was made to explore the areas of pragmatic knowledge presented, and to assess test takers’ pragmatic knowledge. For this purpose, 250 items from each of these three proficiency tests were collected and analyzed. IELTS and TOLIMO tests were taken from preparation textbooks available in the market, and TOEFL tests were taken from the tests administered from 2000 to 2004. To elucidate what areas of pragmatic knowledge was involved in each item, Jung’s (2002) classification of components of pragmatic knowledge was used. In this study, pragmatic knowledge, includedthe ability to perform speech acts, the ability to convey and interpret non-literal meanings, the ability to perform politeness functions, the ability to perform discourse functions, and the ability to use cultural knowledge. The results of the study showed that TOLIMO, TOEFL and IELTS tests are able to assess test takers’ pragmatic knowledge; however, higher instances of pragmatic knowledge components were involved in TOEFL and TOLIMO test.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza Karbalaei & Mehrnaz Kashkooli Rahmanzade, 2015. "An Investigation into Pragmatic Knowledge in the Reading Section of TOLIMO, TOEFL, and IELTS Examinations," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 208-208, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:5:p:208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/47962/25747
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/47962
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:5:p:208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.