IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v5y2012i2p58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of Private Language Institute Teachers’ Perceptions of Written Grammar Feedback in EFL Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Jodaie
  • Farahman Farrokhi

Abstract

This study set out to explore private language institute EFL teachers’ perceptions of written grammar feedback and also to specify their reasons for choosing comprehensive or selective feedback and some feedback strategies over some others. Data were collected from 30 EFL teachers by means of a questionnaire. The results indicated that the teachers have positive perceptions of written grammar feedback. Most of them also prefer direct feedback to indirect feedback strategies and tend to mark grammatical errors comprehensively. The study concludes by providing some implications for the field of EFL writing instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Jodaie & Farahman Farrokhi, 2012. "An Exploration of Private Language Institute Teachers’ Perceptions of Written Grammar Feedback in EFL Classes," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(2), pages 1-58, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:2:p:58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/14563/9928
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/14563
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:2:p:58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.