IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v5y2012i12p121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Experiential Learning Styles and the Immediate and Delayed Retention of English Collocations among EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Afsaneh Mohammadzadeh

Abstract

This study was carried out to find out if there was any significant difference in learning English collocations by learning with different dominant experiential learning styles. Seventy-five participants took part in the study in which they were taught a series of English collocations. The entry knowledge of the participants with regard to collocations items of the treatment as well as the difficulty level of the items were controlled. Upon the completion of the treatment, participants’ retention of the items was measured in an immediate and a delayed recognition type tests. The results showed a statistically significant difference among the four experiential learning style groups. The findings offer a number of implications with regard to the teaching and learning of English collocations.

Suggested Citation

  • Afsaneh Mohammadzadeh, 2012. "The Relationship between Experiential Learning Styles and the Immediate and Delayed Retention of English Collocations among EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(12), pages 121-121, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:12:p:121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/21802/14201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/21802
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:5:y:2012:i:12:p:121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.