IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v3y2010i4p142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Upper Primary Teachers’ Perceptions of PSLE English Oral Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Norashikin Binte Mohamed Noor
  • Mohan K. Muniandy
  • Shashi Kumar Krishnan Shanmugan
  • Emily Jothee Mathai

Abstract

This small scale study investigated upper primary teachers’ perceptions of the PSLE English oral assessment. It sought to find out the challenges that teachers faced in conducting PSLE English oral assessment and if the assessment format provides a good gauge of pupils’ oral competence. Semi-structured interviews were the main research instruments used in this study. The data collected was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Findings from the data showed that there is heterogeneity in teachers’ views of the PSLE English oral assessment. The study found that 1) there is much variance in the challenges identified by teachers; 2) there are limited common perceptions among teachers regarding the extent that PSLE English oral assessment is a good gauge of pupils’ oral competence; and 3) teachers are for the idea of review and modifications to the current PSLE assessment format however, they did not make any concrete suggestions for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Norashikin Binte Mohamed Noor & Mohan K. Muniandy & Shashi Kumar Krishnan Shanmugan & Emily Jothee Mathai, 2010. "Upper Primary Teachers’ Perceptions of PSLE English Oral Assessment," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4), pages 142-142, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:4:p:142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/37022/20726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/37022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:3:y:2010:i:4:p:142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.