IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v18y2025i1p26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Effective Teacher Feedback in English Continuation Writing Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Ruijia Yang
  • Cheng Li

Abstract

As an important part of classroom discourse, effective teacher feedback ensures the quality of classroom discourse. Most studies nowadays take reading or writing classes as research subjects, but the research on teacher feedback in continuation writing classes has not been discussed yet. Besides, most researchers pay less attention to the effective use of teacher feedback. Therefore, in order to find out the effective use of teacher feedback in continuation writing classes, this paper will explore the characteristics of effective teacher feedback by observation and discourse analysis methods in five excellent English continuation writing classes. The main findings are as follows- experienced teachers attach great importance to the use of feedback; second, experienced teachers prefer to use mixed feedback; third, teachers are supposed to use different types of teacher feedback, especially the Question Closely, Repetition plus Question Closely and Recast plus Question Closely. These findings will remind teachers of the importance of teacher feedback, and provide useful guidelines for teachers who are confused about how to use teacher feedback in continuation writing class.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruijia Yang & Cheng Li, 2025. "A Study of Effective Teacher Feedback in English Continuation Writing Classes," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/51114/55477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/51114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.