IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v17y2024i9p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissecting Neuromyths – Bridging the Gap between Education and Neuroscience in EFL Pedagogy

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Zhou

Abstract

This study investigates the prevalence of neuromyths among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers and examines their general neuroscience knowledge (GNK). Neuromyths, often stemming from misinterpretations of neuroscience research, can lead to ineffective teaching practices. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, surveying 45 EFL teachers to assess their GNK and beliefs in common neuromyths, while considering variables such as gender, years of teaching experience, educational background, and exposure to neuroscience training. Additionally, a case study explores the practical integration of educational neuroscience concepts (ENCs) into EFL teaching. The findings reveal a moderate level of GNK among participants, but a significant struggle in identifying neuromyths, particularly those related to learning styles and brain usage. Teachers with more teaching experience tend to hold stronger neuromyth beliefs. The case study demonstrates both the challenges and benefits of applying ENCs in EFL teaching, showing improvements in teaching strategies and student outcomes. The study highlights the critical need to enhance neuroscience literacy among EFL teachers through targeted professional development programs. These programs should focus on debunking neuromyths and promoting evidence-based teaching strategies. The conclusions emphasize the importance of integrating neuroscience education into teacher training to improve teaching effectiveness and student learning. Future research should investigate the long-term impacts of such training and explore the application of neuroscience principles across various educational contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Zhou, 2024. "Dissecting Neuromyths – Bridging the Gap between Education and Neuroscience in EFL Pedagogy," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(9), pages 1-1, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/50510/54709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/50510
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.