IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v17y2024i12p101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Working Memory, Task Type, and Chinese High School Students’ English Vocabulary Acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqing Wang
  • Jiafan Tang

Abstract

Audiovisual learning is gaining increasing attention, with factors such as working memory and task type potentially influencing learning outcomes. This study examined English vocabulary acquisition among 110 Chinese high school English as a foreign language learners with varying levels of working memory (high and low) and different types of tasks (input-based and output-based). After engaging in an audiovisual activity, the learners were divided into six groups- a high capacity input group, a high capacity output group, a high capacity control group, a low capacity input group, a low capacity output group, and a low capacity control group. Two vocabulary tests were administered—one immediately after the tasks and the other two weeks later. Using repeated measures ANOVA, the findings revealed that (1) the high capacity learners significantly outperformed the low capacity learners on both the immediate and delayed tests; and (2) while the output groups showed better performance than the input groups on both tests, the differences were not statistically significant. These results add to the findings of existing research on second language (L2) vocabulary acquisition and provide valuable pedagogical insights aimed at improving L2 vocabulary instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqing Wang & Jiafan Tang, 2024. "Working Memory, Task Type, and Chinese High School Students’ English Vocabulary Acquisition," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(12), pages 101-101, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/51018/55329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/51018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.