Author
Listed:
- Tran Thi Thu Thuy
- Nguyen Thi Mai Hoa
- Dao Thi Ngoc Nguyen
Abstract
This study explores how different cognitive styles influence writing performance among English language learners, focusing on a group of 220 second- and third-year students at Dai Nam University. The research aims to understand whether the way students think and process information, whether they are Field Dependent or Independent, Analytic or Holistic, Visual or Verbal, Reflective or Impulsive, affects their ability to excel in writing tasks. To assess this, we used a well-established cognitive style inventory and evaluated writing skills through the IELTS Writing Task 2, a standardized test known for its rigor in measuring academic writing proficiency. Our analysis reveals some interesting patterns. Students with a Field Independent or Analytic cognitive style tended to score lower on writing tasks compared to those who were Field Dependent or Holistic thinkers. This suggests that students who prefer to rely on their own internal judgment and focus on details might struggle more with writing tasks that require broader thinking and external guidance. On the other hand, whether a student was more visual or verbal, reflective or impulsive, didn’t seem to make a big difference in their writing performance. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing and adapting to the diverse cognitive styles in the classroom. By understanding how students think, educators can better support their learning and help them develop stronger writing skills. This study offers valuable insights for teachers and curriculum designers aiming to improve writing instruction and outcomes for English language learners.
Suggested Citation
Tran Thi Thu Thuy & Nguyen Thi Mai Hoa & Dao Thi Ngoc Nguyen, 2024.
"Cognitive Styles and Influences on Academic Writing: An Empirical Investigation among English Language Learners,"
English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(10), pages 1-46, October.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:46
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:17:y:2024:i:10:p:46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.