IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v16y2023i11p83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results

Author

Listed:
  • Chiho Toyoshima
  • Tsukasa Yamanaka

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the actual situation of Japanese university students' use of machine translation (MT). The case study focuses on Japanese university students and not only investigates when students use MT, but also examines how their attitudes change before and after they use MT for their assignments. In this study, Google Translate was used as the MT tool, and Microsoft Excel was used for analysis. By analyzing these results, it was found that when students were allowed to use MT, they themselves decided whether or not to use it depending on their task. Of the skills in writing, reading and listening, it is also found that students tend to use MT the most for writing tasks and the least for listening tasks. In addition, no statistical significance of using MT was found for any of these skills, indicating that the use of MT does not necessarily mean that all language-related questions can be solved. These results could provide valuable data for the future introduction of MT into education. The survey included a diverse range of university students selected through an open application process. However, the sample size was limited, so an extensive survey should be undertaken in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiho Toyoshima & Tsukasa Yamanaka, 2023. "Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(11), pages 1-83, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/49429/53372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/49429
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.