IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v12y2019i9p82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

10 Years vs. 16 Hours: An Effective Curriculum to Improve Chinese College Students’ English Presentation Quality in Public

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Zhu

Abstract

Despite the long-term and intensive English learning educations they received, Chinese college students still have to struggle to make an even 2 minutes professional English presentation. Through more than 10 years English study, their vocabulary and language knowledge are enough for delivering an intermediate level English presentation. By observing a mid-sized (38 students) class study in details and one on one interviewing and surveying in Shanghai University of Engineering Science in 2014. The psychological factors are assumed to the top reason to hinder students from being confident and motivated in speaking English in public. A 16 hours task-based curriculum is designed with sufficient practices focusing on solving these psychologically related problems. Upon comparing and analyzing the detailed assessment data starting from the initial evaluation to the final examination, dramatically improved score and highly elevated sense of self achievement and satisfaction of the students were observed. It is evident the curriculum aimed on students’ motivation and interests, as well as the ‘hands-on’ experiences should generate dramatic improvements for most of the Chinese college students.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Zhu, 2019. "10 Years vs. 16 Hours: An Effective Curriculum to Improve Chinese College Students’ English Presentation Quality in Public," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-82, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/40440/41635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/40440
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.