IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v11y2018i9p68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

he Effect of the 6+1 Trait Writing Model on ESP University Students Critical Thinking and Writing Achievement

Author

Listed:
  • Ali A. Qoura
  • Faten A. Zahran

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the 6+1 trait writing model on ESP university students' critical thinking and writing achievement. It was assumed that students who receive training using the 6+1 trait writing model would reveal greater gains in critical thinking and writing achievement. Six instruments -designed by the researchers- included- (critical thinking skills checklist, writing skills checklist, critical thinking skills test, writing skills test and scoring rubric for critical thinking and analytic scoring rubric for writing) were used for data collection. Results revealed that the traditional method used to teach writing is not as effective as the 6+1 trait writing model that developed critical thinking and writing achievement. The experimental group outdid their counterparts in the control group in critical thinking and writing performance test scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali A. Qoura & Faten A. Zahran, 2018. "he Effect of the 6+1 Trait Writing Model on ESP University Students Critical Thinking and Writing Achievement," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-68, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/76778/42721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/76778
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.