IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eerjnl/v2y2012i1p195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on the Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Henan’s Electricity Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang Shaohui
  • Wang Shanshan
  • Zhang Ruiqin

Abstract

Henan Province, located in the middle of China, is the typical case for a power system predominantly on fossil fuel and electricity sector, which is also the main emission source in Henan Province. In order to evaluate the potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction of the electricity sector in Henan Province , this article analyses different development scenarios based on the “Long-range Energy Alternative Planning System†(LEAP) model to simulate diversification development patterns. Results showed that there is a potential reduction in GHG emission in the Henan’s electricity sector. The government should design and implement different emphasis in different terms. For instance, we founded that the greenhouse gas emission are decreased considerably in technology priority scenario (8.7 MtCO2) and energy structure optimization scenario (30.30 MtCO2)compared with baseline scenario before 2020, in terms of emission intensity per power unit, during 2005-2020, technology priority scenario, energy structure optimization scenario, and baseline scenario descend by 16.1%, 19.1%, 14.2%, respectively. Ultimately, it gives some policy advice to the power industry in Henan province, the advanced generated technologies will be employed to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions greatly before 2015; however, renewable energy and energy structure adjustment will play the dominant role in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions in the long term. It is also suggested to develop carbon tax and “Clean Development Mechanism†(CDM) projects in Henan Province, such as renewable CDM projects, Methane recovery CDM projects, waste heat/gas/pressure recovery CDM projects, to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emission in Henan’s electricity sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Shaohui & Wang Shanshan & Zhang Ruiqin, 2012. "Analysis on the Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Henan’s Electricity Sector," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(1), pages 195-195, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eerjnl:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/eer/article/download/13772/11477
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/eer/article/view/13772
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steenhof, Paul A., 2007. "Decomposition for emission baseline setting in China's electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 280-294, January.
    2. Kroeze, Carolien & Vlasblom, Jaklien & Gupta, Joyeeta & Boudri, Christiaan & Blok, Kornelis, 2004. "The power sector in China and India: greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential and scenarios for 1990-2020," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 55-76, January.
    3. Gnansounou, Edgard & Dong, Jun & Bedniaguine, Denis, 2004. "The strategic technology options for mitigating CO2 emissions in power sector: assessment of Shanghai electricity-generating system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1-2), pages 117-133, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah Förster & Katja Schumacher & Enrica De Cian & Michael Hübler & Ilkka Keppo & Silvana Mima & Ronald D. Sands, 2013. "European Energy Efficiency And Decarbonization Strategies Beyond 2030 — A Sectoral Multi-Model Decomposition," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(supp0), pages 1-29.
    2. Veena, P. & Indragandhi, V. & Jeyabharath, R. & Subramaniyaswamy, V., 2014. "Review of grid integration schemes for renewable power generation system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 628-641.
    3. Lee, Seungmoon & Park, Jin-Won & Song, Ho-Jun & Maken, Sanjeev & Filburn, Tom, 2008. "Implication of CO2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 326-334, January.
    4. Zhang, Qingyu & Weili, Tian & Yumei, Wei & Yingxu, Chen, 2007. "External costs from electricity generation of China up to 2030 in energy and abatement scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4295-4304, August.
    5. Mittal, Shivika & Dai, Hancheng & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Bridging greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy deployment target: Comparative assessment of China and India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 301-313.
    6. Xie, Xuan & Shao, Shuai & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Exploring the driving forces and mitigation pathways of CO2 emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry: 1995–2031," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1004-1015.
    7. Song, Ho-Jun & Lee, Seungmoon & Maken, Sanjeev & Ahn, Se-Woong & Park, Jin-Won & Min, Byoungryul & Koh, Wongun, 2007. "Environmental and economic assessment of the chemical absorption process in Korea using the LEAP model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 5109-5116, October.
    8. Campbell, Alrick, 2018. "Cap prices or cap revenues? The dilemma of electric utility networks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 802-812.
    9. Viput Ongsakul & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Low Carbon Energy Symbiosis for Sustainability: Review of Shared Value-based Policy Metabolism to Enhance the Implementability of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 24-30.
    10. Steenhof, Paul A. & Weber, Chris J., 2011. "An assessment of factors impacting Canada's electricity sector's GHG emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4089-4096, July.
    11. Goh, Tian & Ang, B.W. & Xu, X.Y., 2018. "Quantifying drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation – Current practices and future extensions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1191-1204.
    12. Li, Jun, 2009. "Scaling up concentrating solar thermal technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2051-2060, October.
    13. Zeng, Ming & Yang, Yongqi & Wang, Lihua & Sun, Jinghui, 2016. "The power industry reform in China 2015: Policies, evaluations and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 94-110.
    14. Xu, X.Y. & Ang, B.W., 2013. "Index decomposition analysis applied to CO2 emission studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 313-329.
    15. Liu, Nan & Ma, Zujun & Kang, Jidong, 2017. "A regional analysis of carbon intensities of electricity generation in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 268-277.
    16. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Using an extended logarithmic mean Divisia index approach to assess the roles of economic factors on industrial CO2 emissions of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 101-114.
    17. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "An analysis of the driving forces of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China’s industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 838-849.
    18. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    19. Li, Li & Chen, Changhong & Xie, Shichen & Huang, Cheng & Cheng, Zhen & Wang, Hongli & Wang, Yangjun & Huang, Haiying & Lu, Jun & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2010. "Energy demand and carbon emissions under different development scenarios for Shanghai, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4797-4807, September.
    20. Wei Sun & Ming Meng & Yujun He & Hong Chang, 2016. "CO 2 Emissions from China’s Power Industry: Scenarios and Policies for 13th Five-Year Plan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eerjnl:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.