IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i10p46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training Transfer: Does Training Design Preserve Training Memory?

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Khalifa Alshaali
  • Kamal Ab Hamid
  • Ali Ali Al-Ansi

Abstract

Billions of dollars are lost by low application of ineffective training. Fast declination of training memory may contribute this loss. The present study uses theoretical examinations via a conceptual model to examine the relationship between training memory and transfer behaviour. Training design, training retention (training memory), and training transfer are the study variables. The study population, is the federal ministries in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), was assessed via random sampling. Data were collected by a cross-sectional approach via questionnaires. Back-translation (English to Arabic), a pre-test, and a pilot test were applied to ensure that any modifications of the questionnaire items were precise and effective. The study was analysed via PLS-SEM. Based on the results, all of the study’s hypotheses were accepted, and significant relationships were revealed between the study variables. Training design is highly correlated with training retention, i.e., a premium training design will lead to a high preservation of the knowledge and skills gained from the training programme. Due to the low correlation between training retention and training transfer, the training retention was considered a secondary contributor of applying training to the work environment. If mangers and practitioners tend to achieve successful training transfer, their efforts should concentrate on adopting modern training design techniques, which could sufficiently maintain the training memory and increase training transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Khalifa Alshaali & Kamal Ab Hamid & Ali Ali Al-Ansi, 2018. "Training Transfer: Does Training Design Preserve Training Memory?," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(10), pages 1-46, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:10:p:46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/36987/37105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/36987
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Sikstrom, Sverker, 2004. "A numerical comparison of three potential learning and forgetting models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 281-294, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anzanello, Michel J. & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2011. "Selecting the best clustering variables for grouping mass-customized products involving workers' learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 268-276, April.
    2. Corominas, Albert & Olivella, Jordi & Pastor, Rafael, 2010. "A model for the assignment of a set of tasks when work performance depends on experience of all tasks involved," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 335-340, August.
    3. Alamri, Adel. A. & Balkhi, Zaid T., 2007. "The effects of learning and forgetting on the optimal production lot size for deteriorating items with time varying demand and deterioration rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 125-138, May.
    4. Plaza, Malgorzata, 2016. "Balancing the costs of human resources on an ERP project," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 171-183.
    5. Eryk Szwarc & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Paulina Golińska-Dawson & Zbigniew Banaszak, 2023. "Proactive Operations Management: Staff Allocation with Competence Maintenance Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Hewitt, Mike & Chacosky, Austin & Grasman, Scott E. & Thomas, Barrett W., 2015. "Integer programming techniques for solving non-linear workforce planning models with learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 942-950.
    7. Yamane, Yasuo & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Hamada, Kunihiro & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nur Bahagia, Senator & Diawati, Lucia & Cakravastia, Andi, 2015. "Developing a plant system prediction model for technology transfer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 119-128.
    8. Cavagnini, Rossana & Hewitt, Mike & Maggioni, Francesca, 2020. "Workforce production planning under uncertain learning rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    9. Plaza, Malgorzata & Rohlf, Katrin, 2008. "Learning and performance in ERP implementation projects: A learning-curve model for analyzing and managing consulting costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 72-85, September.
    10. Steven Hoedt & Arno Claeys & El-Houssaine Aghezzaf & Johannes Cottyn, 2020. "Real Time Implementation of Learning-Forgetting Models for Cycle Time Predictions of Manual Assembly Tasks after a Break," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice & Guiffrida, Alfred L., 2010. "Coordinating a three-level supply chain with learning-based continuous improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 27-38, September.
    12. Zanoni, Simone & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2012. "Vendor managed inventory (VMI) with consignment considering learning and forgetting effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 721-730.
    13. Henao, César Augusto & Mercado, Yessica Andrea & González, Virginia I. & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2023. "Multiskilled personnel assignment with k-chaining considering the learning-forgetting phenomena," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Chen, Xi & Thomas, Barrett W. & Hewitt, Mike, 2016. "The technician routing problem with experience-based service times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 49-61.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:10:p:46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.