IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v11y2019i1p61-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Learning Outcomes On Face-Toface And Online Teaching Platforms: Evidence From Major Field Test Scores

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Toyne
  • James E. Briley
  • Terrance Jalbert

Abstract

Online instruction is becoming an increasingly popular course delivery system. This paper examines performance outcomes of finance students receiving face-to-face instruction versus online instruction. We compare the Educational Testing Service Major Field Test (ETS) finance sub-scores of students enrolled in online sections of Principles of Finance with those enrolled in face to face sections over a three-semester period. Results show no evidence of performance differences between online and face to face students

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Toyne & James E. Briley & Terrance Jalbert, 2019. "Comparing Learning Outcomes On Face-Toface And Online Teaching Platforms: Evidence From Major Field Test Scores," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 11(1), pages 61-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:61-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v11n1-2019/BEA-V11N1-2019-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ETS; Online versus Face-to-Face Courses; Educational Testing Service Major Field Exam;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:61-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.