IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/acttax/v15y2023i1p15-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statement On Auditing Standards 145: Was Stakeholder Feedback Incorporated In The Final Standard?

Author

Listed:
  • Arianna Pinello
  • Ara Volkan
  • Adam McCord

Abstract

Understanding the entity’s environment and assessing the risk of material misstatement are fundamentalcomponents of the audit planning process that have been found deficient by regulators, peer reviews, and research studies. In 2020, the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued an exposure draft of a Statement on Auditing Standards to clarify and enhance the requirements for auditors to understand an entity’s system of internal controls and determine the risk of material misstatement. In addition, the proposal modernized the existing audit requirements regarding information technology use and addressing risks arising from such use. This paper analyzes the comment letters submitted to the Auditing Standards Board to assess the degree of stakeholder agreement with the proposed requirements. Next, the language of the exposure draft is compared to the text of the final standard to determine the degree of standard setters’ responsiveness to the feedback they received during the standard-setting process. The analyses suggest general acceptance by respondents, with requests that additional clarifications be provided. The final text of the standard indicates that the standard setters agreed with respondent suggestions. While the final SAS is well received and achieves its aims, further clarification and guidance will be needed for its efficient and effective implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Arianna Pinello & Ara Volkan & Adam McCord, 2023. "Statement On Auditing Standards 145: Was Stakeholder Feedback Incorporated In The Final Standard?," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(2), pages 15-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:15-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/acttax/at-v15n2-2023/AT-V15N2-2023-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy C. Miller & Michael Cipriano & Robert J. Ramsay, 2012. "Do auditors assess inherent risk as if there are no controls?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(5), pages 448-461, May.
    2. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Adrian GROȘANU & Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Nicolae MĂGDAȘ, 2024. "Ethical Dilemmas in Digital Accounting: A Comprehensive Literature Review," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(4), pages 56-67, April.
    3. Ballantine, Joan & Boyce, Gordon & Stoner, Greg, 2024. "A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Bonsón, Enrique & Lavorato, Domenica & Lamboglia, Rita & Mancini, Daniela, 2021. "Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    6. Radu USZKAI & Cristina VOINEA & Toni GIBEA, 2021. "Responsibility Attribution Problems In Companies: Could An Artificial Moral Advisor Solve This?," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 951-959, November.
    7. Khadija Sherece Usher & Benjamin Craig McLellan, 2024. "Inherent Risk Analysis of Power Supply Management: Case of Belize’s System Operator and Third-Party Actors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-35, December.
    8. Ani STOYKOVA, 2024. "AI in Accounting: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(8), pages 56-71, August.
    9. Khowanas Saeed Qader & Kemal Cek, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of External Auditors’ Autonomy on Financial Accounting Information Quality Case Study Commercial Banks in Northern Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Delia DELIU, 2024. "Professional Judgment and Skepticism Amidst the Interaction of Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 22(176), pages 724-741, October.
    11. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. TANASE, George Cosmin, 2024. "The Integration of Emotional Intelligence into AI Marketing: Connecting Brands with Consumers," Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine, Romanian Distribution Committee, vol. 15(1), pages 29-37, March.
    13. Nourallah, Mustafa, 2023. "One size does not fit all: Young retail investors’ initial trust in financial robo-advisors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Han, Hongdan & Shiwakoti, Radha K. & Jarvis, Robin & Mordi, Chima & Botchie, David, 2023. "Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    15. Laura – Eugenia – Lavinia BARNA & Corina – Cătălina HURDUCACI (GOREA), 2024. "The Impact Of Using Artificial Intelligence And Erp Systems In The Work Of Accounting Professionals And Auditors," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 246-258, July.
    16. Zhang, Chao & Zhu, Weidong & Dai, Jun & Wu, Yong & Chen, Xulong, 2023. "Ethical impact of artificial intelligence in managerial accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Serge P. da Motta Veiga & Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark, 2023. "Seeming Ethical Makes You Attractive: Unraveling How Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring Impacts Organizational Innovativeness and Attractiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 199-216, August.
    18. Kirsten Martin & Ari Waldman, 2023. "Are Algorithmic Decisions Legitimate? The Effect of Process and Outcomes on Perceptions of Legitimacy of AI Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 653-670, March.
    19. Shengxing Yang, 2022. "A systematic literature review on the disruptions of artificial intelligence within the business world: in terms of the evolution of competences [Une revue systématique de la littérature sur les bo," Post-Print hal-03694170, HAL.
    20. Fan, Cunbin & Zou, Guohao & Yang, Chufeng & Zhao, Ziqiang, 2024. "Can the digital transformation of pharmaceutical enterprises' finance improve healthcare equity?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SAS No. 145; AICPA; Entity Environment; Risk Assessment; Material Misstatement; Audit Standards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:15-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Mercedes Jalbert to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.